Tea Party Applauds Racist Remarks At Convention

The Tea Party movement seems to have found their head racist.

That’s the conclusion drawn by “unbiased journalist” Rachel Maddow of MSNBC.

And although I agree with her that making African-Americans take a literacy test as a means to keep them from voting was shameful, it is a thing of the past and she needs to get over it.

Tom Trancredo, on the other hand, makes an excellent point.

I, like Mr. Trancredo, have been advocating for years that people should be required to take a basic civics test before being allowed to vote, and I would add the requirement that the potential voter must not only have knowledge of where a candidate stands on particular issues, but if the candidates’ prior voting record reflects his or her current political rhetoric.

As far as restricting voting rights to people who can’t spell or speak the word “vote” in English, Mr. Trancredo and I are in complete agreement.

If someone is an illegal immigrant, they should not be allowed to vote.
And I don’t want to hear any self-righteous whining from you loony liberals, you know that it happens.

And for the immigrants who came to America in search of a better life for themselves and their children, if they don’t care enough about the country they felt was better than the one that they left to learn to speak, read and understand it’s native language, they they should not be given a voice on selecting the people who run it.

Click Here to see a video of Rachel Maddow’s idea of fair and balanced reporting.

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews Makes Racial Slur

Astroturfers

Nazis

Obstructionists

Tea Baggers

And the worst one of all:

Racists

What the members of the liberal mainstream media still don’t get is that we don’t disagree with President Obama’s policies because of the color of his skin, we disagree with President Obama because of his policies!

(The video may take a minute to load)

 

 

“I forgot he was black tonight, for an hour.”

OK Chris, does that meant that you spend the rest of your waking hours thinking about it?

“An African-American guy in front of a bunch of white people.”

And you call us racists?

A Reader Calls Me A Bigot…Maybe He’s Right

In an article I did yesterday, I pointed out some of the glaring inconsistencies in the way liberals think, and in what they believe.
You can read the article here.

And of course some liberal lunatic had to leave the following comment:

“It sounds to me like you’ve encountered people such as yourself and assumed they were liberals because their bigotry and bias was a different flavor than yours.”

When I had said at the beginning of the article that liberals were missing a few brain cells, I was being sarcastic.

Now I’m starting to think that I may be onto something.

Because for someone to call me a bigot due to the fact that I point out the hypocrisy in their belief system, they must have a mental disease.

Then, the more I thought about it, according to the sick and twisted liberal viewpoint, what I believe does make me a bigot.

Really, is this the best you people can do?

There has to be at least one liberal out there out there with the moral courage to face an issue head on.

And I’m not talking about you halfwits who’s answer to everything is “Well, George Bush did this” or “Republicans did that.”

Explain to me why I shouldn’t have anything  but disdain for global warming hypocrite Al Gore, who’s lifestyle produces a bigger carbon footprint in a month than I do in a year!
And please don’t give me any of that crap about “carbon credits, the last guy to come up with a Ponzi scheme like that was Bernie Maddoff.

Justify the actions of the ACLU, a group of legal sharks who repeatedly file lawsuits hoping to stop the Boy Scouts of America from receiving any federal funding over the fact that the BSA refuses to have admitted homosexuals as Scoutmasters.
ACORN has received millions of federal dollars more than the Scouts have, is the ACLU suing ACORN for their staffers instructing people an how to make children become child prostitutes?
No?
I didn’t think so.

A few years ago, the ACLU served pro bono as defense counsel for two pieces of human garbage who sodomized and murdered a 9 year old boy.
Guess that’s something to be proud of, huh?

Tell me again why I should support President Obama’s appointment of Kevin Jennings as “Safe Schools Czar.”
A man who turned a blind eye to the homosexual statutory rape of a 15 year old boy.

Those of you living in your liberal fantasy world may find this hard to believe, but I don’t really care how two consenting adults choose to live their lives, or pick their sexual partners.

My problem arises when America’s school system tries to teach children about moral and lifestyle choices.
That is not the job of a schoolteacher, that is the job of a parent.
We who consider ourselves conservatives don’t need you to raise our children for us, we are perfectly capable of doing it on our own.

The holiday season will soon be upon us, and this will compel those on the left to go into one of their favorite rants.

Point out to me where in the United States Constitution the phrase “Separation of Church and State” appears.

Just what is it about Christmas that scares you lefties so much?

“Peace on Earth, Good Will Towards Men” sounds like a pretty good plan to me.

And despite your contempt for any public display of them, when you come right down to it, the Ten Commandments aren’t a bad set of rules to live by.

Please explain to me how Keith Olbermann is more level-headed and fairer than Glenn Beck.
Yet you have nothing but respect for the one, and nothing but contempt for the other.

Clear up for me how many of you are outraged when people in a neighborhood will post signs pointing out that a child molestor has moved into an area.
Are liberals really so mentally sick that they are more concerned with hurting the feelings of a pervert than they are with the safety of young children?

Give me a credible reason why we should think that the government is capable of competently running the health care industry when they foul up almost everything else they put their hands to>
Are we really supposed to believe that our medical records will remain private when a teenage kid can hack into computers at the Pentagon?

I could keep going on with this, but here is the bottom line:

I think that anyone who lives a life of wretched excess while telling me that I have to completelychange my lifestyle because “the earth is in the balance” is nothing more than a money-grubbing hypocrite that is beneath contempt.

I have nothing but disdain for any group of attorneys, no matter what fancy title they choose to give themselves, who defend admitted child molesters and murderers.

If a man wants to have sex with a man, a woman with a woman, or any combination thereof, I don’t care.
But I don’t want the state teaching moral values to my children, that’s a job for myself and my wife.
And if my idea of morality doesn’t mesh with yours, that’s too damn bad.

I fail to see how a Nativity scene on a courthouse lawn will bring about the end of civilization.
Any more than any other religious symbol would.

Please don’t expect me to be delusional enough to believe that pindits such as Sean Hannitty or Michelle Malkin are rabid mad-dog conservatives while in the same breath you try and convince me that Rachel Maddow and Chris Matthews sall them right down the middle.

Not only don’t I want a sexual predator living in my neighborhood, Iwould go out of my way to make things so uncomfortable for such an individual that they would move.
And I would urge the folks in the area that this person moved to to do the same thing.
Would I be violating this persons rights?
Too damn bad.
Because unlike you liberals, I feel that the right of a child to be safe from a molester, or a woman from a rapist, far exceed the rights of a pervert.

I don’t feel that the government has any right whatsoever to dictate the terms of my medical coverage.
A while back I put forth the proposal that anyone who wants to sign on to the President’s health care proposals should be allowed to do so.
And that the feds should leave those of us who are happy with the coverage we have now the hell alone.

All of these things are a part of my belief system.

And if that makes me a bigot, then so be it.

Forget Swine Flu, We Need A Vaccine For Liberalism

Seriously.

We have a vaccine for swine flu because we know the effects.

How is it that medical research can’t develop a vaccine to prevent people from developing amnesia, and for their thinking to become so twisted that they start to believe that up is down, and for some things failing to register in their minds at all?

One of our recent articles asked the question “Who is more legitimate, Fox News or the White House?

This led one reader to leave a response to the points we raised, which once again displayed all of the symptoms of this disease that we outlined above.

One of the things this person said was that the media did fact-check George Bush, but that it happened 8 years too late.

No doubt this person was dragging out the tired old argument that “George Bush got us into a war in Iraq under false pretenses,There were never any WMD’s.”

This is where the amnesia part of this tragic illness makes itself known.

This poor soul obviously can’t remember such things as:

“If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”
–President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

“Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.”
–Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”
–Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”
– Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members … It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”
– Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

Our respondent then went on to say:
“Fox News is the mouthpiece of the Republican Party. What they talk about is not news. If it were news, there would be measured debate, a modicum of respect….”
And a bit later threw this in:
“If we on the left had treated Bush anywhere like this, you’d be foaming at the mouth even more.”

OK, if Fox News is the mouthpiece of the Republican Party, does that make the crew at MSNBC the official spokespeople for the Democrats?

Sure, Fox News has people with opinionated shows, such as Sean Hannity, Glen Beck , etc.

And I realize that it is just another symptom of the disease this man is suffering from that leads him to believe that  commentators such as Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews and Rachel Maddow never allow their own political ideology to influence their remarks.

“A modicum of respect….”
“If we on the left had treated Bush anywhere like this, you’d be foaming at the mouth even more.”

See, there’s that damn amnesia indicator again.

Sir, try and remember these:

Keith Olbermann calling George Bush the “worst person ever.”

Chris Matthews, following Bush’s farewell address, referred to the Bush Presidency as “the tragedy of the last eight years.”

How about a guest on Olbermann’s show, Janeane Garofalo, who told him that “Tea Parties are about racism, not politics.”

How much respect did you folks on the left show when one of you made the following comment:

“Republicans are shameless d**ks. No, that’s not fair,Republican politicians are shameless d**ks.

You took the author of that quote, Al Franken, and made him a United States Senator!

And you accuse those of us on the right of showing no respect?

Finally, this gentleman offered the following observation:

It has to be hard the on Obama administration to do its work when it is constantly having to deal with the lies, hyperbole, and ugly talk that is right on the edge of traitorous.

This is the part of this sickness that causes people to think backwards.

Let’s try this one at a time.

Regarding lies and hyperbole, we have said that his Cabinet contains some undesirable people.
Case in point, Timothy Geithner, who had a bit of a problem paying his income taxes.

We have mentioned the corruption of his “Czars.”
Case in point, former Czar, avowed Communist and 9-11 conspiracy nut Van Jones.
Along with Regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein, who thinks that animals should be allowed to sue humans in a court of law.
Leave us not forget Science Czar John Holdren, who advocates sterility drugs being put into public water supplies.
How about Chai Felblum, the President’s pick to serve on the EEOC, who made the statement “Gay sex is morally good.”

To all of you who stand firmly behind President and his policies, do you seriously mean to tell me that you don’t have a problem with a “Safe Schools” Czar who not only did not report a case of statutory homosexual rape to the authorities, he gave the 15 year-old young man advice on the proper way to conduct his relationship with a sexual predator?

We pointed out that the Obama Administration was attempting the freezing-out of a major news organization, and urging other media outlets to do the same.

We quoted a journalist who has never seen an administration call for a boycott of news outlet during his time of covering eight presidents.

I could go on and on, you tell me sir, where are the lies?
Read through all of our articles and point out where exactly are the lies and hyperbole.

“Ugly talk that is right on the edge of traitorous”

Are you SURE you want to go down that road?

You may want to think really hard about the words and actions of Cindy Sheehan, members of Code Pink, various members of the Democratic Party as well as the mainstream media, to name just a few.

And before you answer, you may want to give thanks that a little something that was known as the Sedition Act is no longer in effect, if it were, I would not be writing this because folks like you and the rest of your liberal allies would be in a federal prison.

Sorry my friend, but not agreeing with President Obama’s policies does not make me a traitor, any more than it makes me a Nazi or a racist.

And please don’t ask me to believe that you folks on the left treated George Bush any better than the right treats Barack Obama.

And with all of the invective that was thrown his way, I can’t seem to recall Bush ever calling for the boycott of a news organization, or attempting to ban one of it’s staffers from the White House.

However, George Bush is not the point.

The point is that you folks on the left can’t all be insane.

There has to be a few of you who take a look at something the President is proposing, an administrative appointment he makes, whatever, and stop and think about if you agree with him, not just mindlessly fall into line.

And if there aren’t at least a few of you like that, then God help us all.

Keeping America Safe From The Maniacs In The Media

As a recent Presidential election showed, many people are swayed by the media.

They believe what some talking head tells them.

The fact that there are two sides to every story means that they might actually have to find out the truth for themselves, which for most of them is way too much effort.

And who will keep us safe from the ranters?

When William Safire died the other day, we lost one of the Elders of journalism and the argumentative arts. We’ve been losing a lot of them lately: Walter Cronkite, Bob Novak, Don Hewitt, Irving Kristol. “The stars seem to be going out one by one,” said Howard Stringer at Cronkite’s memorial.

At a gathering of Safire’s friends and family this week, Bill stories were told with affection, humor, and a bit of awe. He made his way in a profession that was, early on, hostile to the former Nixon speechwriter and PR man. He barreled through with well-marshalled gifts and a heroic work effort. He was a famous lover of words and language whose deepest loyalty was reserved, kept apart, for his wife, children and friends. He took care of those in his ken. And there was the professionalism: He loved journalism, respected what he did, loved helping young ones on the way up, and was so proud of his work that he was only half kidding when he said, “It’s not a column, it’s a pillar.”

Anyway, everyone there knew we’d suddenly lost one of the great ones, the Elders, and there is lately a sense of a changing of the guard.

***

Who are the Elders? They set the standards. They hand down the lore. They’re the oldest and wisest. By proceeding through the world each day with dignity and humanity, they show the young what it is that should be emulated. They’re the tribal chieftains. This role has probably existed since caveman days, because people need guidance and encouragement, they need to be heartened by examples of endurance. They need to be inspired.

We are in a generational shift in the media, and new Elders are rising. They’re running the networks and newspapers, they own the Web sites, they anchor the shows. What is their job?

It’s to do what the Elders have always done, but now more than ever.

You know the current media environment. You think I’m about to say, “Boy, what’s said on cable, radio and the Internet now is really harmful and dangerous.” And you’re right, and it is. Some of the ranters don’t have the...Read the rest of this entry

Barack Obama Made Me A Star!

In my wildest dreams, I had no idea that Barack Obama becoming President would make me famous.

However, I do have a dilemma.

Read the article below, then tell me how I can agree with the President on being on the road to stardom when the very reason I am is because I don’t agree with him.

 President Obama turned media critic during his Sunday show marathon, zinging television news during interviews on CNN, ABC, CBS and NBC for making stars out of people who are “rude.” Obama wants bookers to reward “decency” and “civility” in public discourse.

We’ll see.

Obama seemed determined to make this point because the president used remarkably similar language during his interviews with Sunday morning show hosts, deploring the state of discourse, especially on cable news shows.

Obama, who also sat down with Univision, snubbed the outlet where many of his loudest critics have found a perch — Fox News Channel.

The interviews were taped back-to-back Friday afternoon in the Roosevelt room of the White House.When I walked by the Roosevelt Room earlier on Friday en route to an interview with an Obama official in the West Wing, the room looked like a television studio, stuffed with lights, wires, cameras and other equipment.

Obama of course, owns the top bully pulpit, and can get on television almost at will. He’s done more interviews at this stage of his presidency — eight months ago today — than George Bush and Bill Clinton. A standard Obama line through the years has been that you don’t have to be disagreeable to disagree. But as he noted on Sunday, that does not get you on the news.

On CNN, Obama told John King, host of “State of the Union”:

“I think it’s important for the media — you know, not to do any media-bashing here — to recognize that right now, in this 24-hour news cycle, the easiest way to get on CNN or FOX or any of the other stations, MSNBC, is to say something rude and outrageous.

“If you’re civil and polite and you’re sensible, and you don’t …Read the rest of this entry

How ACORN Sowed The Seeds Of Their Own Destruction

Just how nutty is ACORN?

Very, say longtime watchers of the extreme leftwing group that sprouted out of a radical 60s anti-government movement.

For decades ACORN has presented itself as a grassroots network dedicated to improving the lives of the poor.

But there’s more to ACORN than its do-gooder veneer.

Just ask the banks, corporations and politicians who’ve been the target of ACORN’s shameless shenanigans over the past 40 years.

Here’s how the tiny seed of 1960s radicalism blossomed into a well-funded, national organization with political connections reaching all the way to the White House:

THE BEGINNING

*ACORN is rooted in extreme far-left activism that wants to shut down the US government by overwhelming it with demands for welfare benefits and other forms of assistance.

“They don’t like the American system of government, and would love for it to be overthrown,” said ACORN expert Matthew Vadum, a senior editor at the conservative Capital Research Center in D.C.

“The whole goal is to transform America into a socialist country, or some form of socialist democracy. This group is dangerous.”

*Founder Wade Rathke was a student at Williams College in 1969 and a member of the leftist Students for a New Democracy group when he dropped out to protest the Vietnam War full-time.

*Rathke began working for fiery activist George Wiley, a black radical who started the National Welfare Reform Organization in 1969. NWRO was created to help poor people sign up for more welfare benefits, with the goal of clogging and eventually grinding down US government…Read the rest of this entry

Bring Some Acorns To The Next Tea Party

The next time there is a Tea Party event in your area, urge everyone attending to bring a bag of acorns.

And put someone in charge of providing some large trash cans.

Then making sure that someone from the media is nearby, have everyone walk up to the trash cans and throw the acorns in.

And when some liberal, biased pinhead from the MSM asks: “Why are you racists doing this?”, you can expain how President Obama may have a fondness for nuts, but that you don’t care for them.

Then you can refer them to this:

While ACORN remains riddled in scandal, lawmakers have voted to cut off federal funding to the group, the U.S. Census Bureau has severed ties to the organization – and the White House has blasted its behavior as “unnacceptable.”

But just how extensive are President Obama’s personal ties to ACORN?

The following is a timeline outlining some of the purported connections between the president and ACORN through the years:

1990s: Obama meets ACORN

ACORN, or the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, first noticed Obama when he was organizing on the far south side of the city with the Developing Communities Project . A March 2, 2008, Los Angeles Times article by Letta Tayler and Keith Herbert, titled “Obama Forged Path As Chicago Community Organizer,” explored Obama’s pre-law school days as a community organizer in Chicago and his efforts to build a partnership with Chicago’s “Friends of the Parks.”

“Obama’s task was to help far South Side residents press for improvement,” the Times article explained.

National Review Online noted, “Part of Obama’s work, it would appear, was to organize demonstrations, much in the mold of radical groups like ACORN.”

The Times article reveals that Madeleine Talbot, who at the time was a leader at Chicago ACORN, was thoroughly impressed with Obama because “he got people to vote with their feet.”

“At the time, Talbot worked at the social action group ACORN and initially considered Obama a competitor,” the article stated. “But she became so impressed with his work that she invited him to help train her staff.”

Talbott personally led Chicago ACORN’s campaign to intimidate banks into…Read the rest of this entry

Glenn Beck Should Ask This Question: Is ACORN Bribing The Mainstream Media?

Fox News commentator Glenn Beck is certainly no stranger to controversy.

Eyebrows were raised when he left CNN, which really wasn’t a good fit for him, and joined Fox.

And his relentless style of reporting has caused quite an uproar.

He recently created a firestorm when he brought to light the background of Van Jones, which led to Jones resigning his post as President Obama’s “green jobs” czar.

And now he is at it again.

His latest investigation is once again focused on the widespread corruption at ACORN.

First, take a look at the following video clip.

You will see how a young woman posing as a prostitute receives advice from ACORN on how to set up a child slavery ring, and how to avoid paying taxes to the IRS.

The second video will showcase how the MSM must be on the ACORN payroll.

Here is the clip from the Glenn Beck show:

Now, how does one reach the conclusion that ACORN is paying off the MSM?
Watch:

“They found one office where the people were stupid enough to give them this kind of silly advice.”
“It sounds to me like that’s just entrapment.”

“It’s entrapment.”
“They went to four offices and one took the bait.”

Someone must be bribing the members of the mainstream media!

It doesn’t matter if these people went to four offices or four hundred!

The bottom line remains that ACORN staffers advised someone on how to set up a child prostitution ring!!

Yet all that you pinheads are concerned about is that the people at ACORN might have been victims of entrapment.

The entrapment of children into becoming sex slaves you don’t see fit to mention.

How do you men shave every morning?

Because if I were more concerned with making Glenn Beck and conservatives in general look bad than I was about ACORN members giving out this sort of advice, I’ll be damned if I would be able to look at myself in a mirror.

MSNBC Host: Word “Socialist” Code For The “N-Word”

This is stretching things far beyond rational thought, even for the far-left crowd at MSNBC.

In the video below, Carlos Watson tries to make the case that the word “Socialist” is simply a code word for the racial epithet that begins with the letter “N”.

Carlos, let me hit you with a dose of reality.

The reason you hear so many conservatives using the word “Socialist” is because that is exactly what the President’s policies are!

This administration has, for all intents and purposes, nationalized the American auto industry, they are now hoping to do the same thing with health care.

Watch the video:

Sorry pal, but playing the race card only makes you look like a fool.

Somehow you fail to mention that the word “Socialist” has been directed at others besides the President, such as the other members of the administration who support the government taking charge of our medical treatment.

You also state that “words have meaning” (stole that one from Rush Limbaugh, didn’t you), yet I suppose in your reverse-racist world it’s OK for members of Congress such as Nancy Pelosi or Stoney Hoyer to call people that are opposed to this health care “reform” bill such things as Nazis and un-American for making their voices heard.

It’s really sad to see that mainstream “joirnalism” has sunk so low that a commentator has to make false accusations of racism in order to try and prove a point.

Next Page »