Obama Buddy Bill Ayers Hoping To Form Peace Movement

The man who help launch President Obama’s first foray into politics, William Ayers, is hoping to form a peace movement.

In an interview with Fox News, Ayers, who along with Bernadine Dohrn were co-founders of the Weather Underground, a 70’s era group of violent radicals, he had this to say:

“I think that what we need is a peace movement, and I’m trying to build one.”

When questioned as to how he planned on doing it, his reply was:

“Well, I mean, how do you build a movement? How do you build a civil rights movement or peace movement? Look at history. All kinds of ways, but what we need is to stop spending billions of dollars on war and we need to invest in being a nation among nations and giving up on the insanity of thinking we can conquer the world.”

So, William Ayers wants to form a peace movement.

Seems kind of ironic coming from Ayers who, along with his wife Dohrn and their fellow domestic terrorists in the Weather Underground were responsible for attempting to blow up dozens of military and civilian security facilities, and during their reign of terror the actions of the Weather Underground were directly responsible for the killing of three police officers.

This talk of forming a peace movement is what William Ayers has to say now.

Compare it with what he had to say then:

“Everything was absolutely ideal on the day I bombed the Pentagon.”
“The sky was blue. The birds were singing. And the bastards were finally going to get what was coming to them.”

Now if that statement didn’t urge you to hold hands with someone and sing Kumbaya, how about this one:

“Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars apartments. Bring the revolution home, Kill your parents.”

Oh yes Mr. Ayers, you’re a peaceable man.

About as peaceful as a suicide bomber.

You know, the next time you try and blow up a building, why don’t you try that method?

The Most Dangerous Woman In America

Not only does Janet Napolitano get our vote for the most incompetent member of the Obama administration, she is also the most dangerous woman in America.

What else can be said of the person who heads the Department of Homeland Security, the agency tasked with keeping America safe from further attacks of terrorism, when it’s obvious that she doesn’t have a clue.

In a story you can read here on Newsmax, she re-affirms the administration’s desire to carry through with closing the prison at Guantanamo Bay, even though the deadline proposed by President Obama has passed.

So, her focus is on the closure of Club Gitmo.

How does she treat some other aspects of her position?

Christmas Day underwear bomber?
Well, according to Napolitano, “the system worked.”

Uh, Janet, a civilian passenger on the flight tackling the attempted bomber is not part of the system.
Of course, the flight did originate from overseas, so perhaps she thought she would get a free pass because it wasn’t a domestic flight.

This is the same woman who the only thing domestic that she worries about is her claim that returning war veterans are “potential domestic terrorists.”

We just had a visit from a friend of my daughter’s who recently returned from a tour of duty in Iraq.
This person is as likely to be a terrorism threat as I am to becoming a brain surgeon.

As are any of the members of the military I have known, including the many Iraq and Afghanistan vets I have met during the course of that very same daughter joining the Marine Corps.
She leaves for boot camp in May, and no matter where she is deployed, when she returns home I know that the last thing on earth I or anyone else will have to worry about is her being a threat to national security.

I’d feel a bit safer if Ms. Napolitano would follow the advice I offered her in this article from back in October and concentrate on dealing with the Jihadist traing camps that are right here on American soil.

Or if the DHS would take the time to monitor the activities of groups such as Hizb-Ut-Tahrir, a group many terrorism experts consider to be a bigger threat than al-Qaeda, as we reported here, back in July.

However, these matters don’t seem to be very high on Ms. Napolitano’s priority list.

Closing Club Gitmo, now that’s a job that needs to get done, because her boss made a promise.

Hey Janet, Obama hasn’t kept most of his promises, why worry about one that will wind up transferring terrorism suspects onto U.S. soil?

Napolitano is supposed to keep us safe?

God help us all.

A DHS Profile Of a Potential Domestic Terrorist

Some time ago, Janet Napolitano and her gang at the Department Of Homeland Security labeled returning veterans as “potential domestic terrorists.”

Ms Napolitano, in whatever passes for thinking in the world she lives in, feel that vets are prime targets to be recruited by “right-wing extremist” groups.

I know of someone who fits her criteria exactly.

Small town farm boy who enlists in the military at an early ages, goes off to war, and then returns to America with no job and no discernable skills.

So today, on a day when we pay tribute to the brave nen and women who have fought and died in order to allow Ms Napolitano to make such irrational statements, we thought that we should clear something up for her:

Rather than being a threat to America’s security, those veterans are the only thing that has kept America secure.

Those veterans, such as the man featured in this video, are the only reason you could say something that stupid.

(Oh, and for all of you liberals, as well as those of you who know nothing of American history (or is that the same thing?), the man profiled in the video below was not the fantasy of some Hollywood fathead, this closing clip is from the exploits of an actual patriotic American who became the most-decorated soldier of World War Two.)

Update: Janet Napolitano, Domestic Terrorism And The Oathkeepers.

We have been coming down pretty hard on Department Of Homeland Security director Janet Napolitano lately.

And we aren’t done yet.

And neither are our readers.

We just received a comment regarding an article we did about the Oathkeepers:

“I am a veteran. I served 22 years in the US Army, the 1st Ranger Battalion, 10th Mountain Division, and finally 17 years in 5th Special Forces Group (A)! I am disgusted with the latest administration. It hurts me to know that people that I put my life on the line to defend put this knucklehead in charge. CHANGE!!!  I support the Oath Keepers decision. I must say that anyone that comes to my home to get my guns had better bring help. Lots of help. I wont have my Constitutional rights violated or disregarded. I heard that the illegal president wanted to put soldiers with my background on a terrorist watch list or some such. Have you heard anything about this? Keep up the good work. It takes us all to make a great nation!”

Sir, let us first say that it is an honor to hear from someone such as yourself who as devoted so many years to serving his country.

However, we are sorry to say that what you had heard regarding Janet Napolitano and veterans is true.

Watch the video:

 

Do The Benefits Of Jihadist Training Camps In America Outweigh The Risks?

We just did a story on what we feel is the failure of the Department of Homeland Security to keep America safe.

And it generated comments from two sides of the fence, both whom claim to have experience in undercover intellegence operations.
You can read the original article and the comments here.

Of course, we have no means to verify or disprove undercover ops experience of the commenters.

One individual, going under the pseudonym Cherokee Parks, clearly understood the satirical nature of our implying that Janet Napolitano was getting her information from us.
And the point we were trying to make.
The other didn’t.

Regardless, the other person went on about how we have no idea of what is being done in order to keep America safe.
And stated that our “exaggerated journalism”  “reflects poorly on all of us.”
This individual also took the position that these jihadist training camps on American soil are common knowledge.

Let’s tackle that last one first.

After we closed up shop, Salvaterra and I went to one of our favorite spots to get a pizza and a few beers.
We are fairly well-know at this place, and we publicly asked the people there if they had ever heard of terrorist training camps here in America.
Out of roughly 40 people who were in the place, not one of them had ever heard of such a thing.

So much for exaggerated journalism.

Now, as to this person’s other position that everything that can be done is being done, we have one word:

Bull*hit!

Neither of us have any experience in intellegence gathering operations.
What we do have is common sense.

Which leads us to ask, what possible benefit is there to be gained by allowing these camps to exist?

Even if there is a CIA or FBI agent working undercover in one of these terrorist training grounds, what information is this agent likely to learn?

If the head jihadist receives word that another 9-11 style attack is forthcoming, will that person really be stupid enough to share that information with everyone in the camp?
Net gain.
Nothing.

Perhaps this person would learn of an additional training camp opening at another location.

Seeing as how the DHS doesn’t see fit to do anything as to the camps it does know about, what good does this information do?

We need someone to explain to us how in the world allowing these camps to operate right here in America is an effective strategy in keeping us safe.

Because it is our opinion that a group of terrorists who are already in this country, and could decide at any moment to leave the camp in order to kill civilians or to destroy an American city are a threat that needs to be dealt with in no uncertain terms.
James Bond tactics be damned.

And we can’t place all of the blame on Napolitano’s shoulders.

Former DHS directors Tom Ridge and Michael Chertoff are just as guilty for allowing this.

What is different now is, what do you think would would happen if say, members of a gun club or a veterans organization were to open up a similar style training camp?

Janet “you’re all potential domestic terrorists” Napolitano would call out a SWAT team and swarm the place faster than you could blink.

Of course, offending America’s veterans and offending a group of Muslim terrorists are two different things.

Again, we have no background in intellegence operations.

Therefore, we need someone to explain to us how allowing these camps to exist outweighs the dire risk that they pose.

A risk that could become a reality at any time.

The Department Of Homeland Security Finally Catches Up With The Freedom Medium

Janet Napolitano and her crew at the Department Of Homeland Security finally found us.

She must have stumbled across us, read some of our commentary, watched the Fox News videos, and started to become aware of what we have been talking about for months.

And we don’t mind her taking credit for our hard work, we just wish she had started paying attention a little sooner.

On October 12th, she made the following statements in an interview with Bloomberg TV:

“It is fair to say there are individuals in the United States who ascribe to al-Qaeda-type beliefs.”
“And so it makes information-sharing, it makes effective law enforcement and it makes the shared responsibility of law enforcement ever so important.”

Ms. Napolitano, we shared the sort of information that you are just now talking about months ago!

Take a look at updates to just two of our reports on this topic:

Back in April, we found that there are at least 35 Jihadist training camps right here in America, primarily on the eastern end of the country.
The Fox News video below outlines the practices of this movement, but our research uncovered more troubling information.

For instance, in just one example of what the government is allowing to take place on our own soil, there is a 50 acre jihadist training compound near the town of Red House in Virginia.
If you are down that way, it’s easy enough to find as there is a street sign pointing out the road to Sheikh Gilani Lane.
Sheikh Gilani is reported to be a close ally of Osama bin Laden.
Mubarak Ali Gilani is on record as having said that he wants to “purify” Islam through violent actions.

We also uncovered the fact that at all of these training camps, there is a sign identifying the groups as “The Muslims of the Americas.”
What you won’t see are any signs explaining that the name these groups use is an offshoot of Jamaat ul-Fuqra, a sister agency of Al-Qaeda.

In another example, there is a terrorist training camp near Hancock, N.Y. that calls itself “Islamberg.”
It is run by Ghulam Mustafa, another individual with close ties to Osama bin Laden.
Mustafa plays an important role in Al-Qaeda’s planning and financing.

If all of this wasn’t disturbing enough, then I came across this story in the New York Post reporting how members of al-Shabab, a radical Islamic group based in Somalia that has ties to both Al Qaeda and Somali pirates, have taken 20 young men from Minnesota to fight in Somalia. You can read the story here.

The facts we uncovered, along with the information in the video, are truly alarming.
Maybe the DHS should hire someone to read reports like ours, and to watch for similar news reports like this one:

Then, in July, we did an article reporting on how nearly 500 members of Hizb-Ut-Tahrir held a convention in a Chicago-area Hilton Hotel.

Although not officially recognized as a terrorist organization by the State Department, many terrorism experts, one example of which is shown in the video appearing a little later in this article, consider them to be more of a threat to America’s security than al-Qaeda.

The man appearing in the video, Walid Phares, explains how Hizb-Ut-Tahrir trains youth between the ages of 9 to 18 in the ideology of “Khilafah”, which is a fundamental belief in the rule of Islamic law no matter what the means that may be taken to achieve it.

A spokesman for the group, Mohammad Malkawi claims that the group condemns terrorism in any form.

That statement would appear to be at odds with actions taken by some of the groups alumni, such as Khalid Skeikh Mohammed, the alleged plotter of the 9-11 attacks, to name just one.

Watch the video:

Malkawi also made the statement that the objective of the group is ”To create an Islamic state of Khilafah in the Muslim World.”

“The Muslim World.”

Last time we checked, Chicago was not the heartland of the Muslim world.

And as we said at the time, none of this will come as a surprise to our regular readers and subscribers.

And if we are paying close attention to these things, then why aren’t the people who are in charge of keeping us safe doing so?

How in the hell could Ms. Napolitano and her crew at the DHS fail to recognize that perhaps a convention of 500 supporters of a radical Islamic ideology, as well as numerous terrorist training camps scattered across America are a serious threat to the safety and security of this country?

“It is fair to say there are individuals in the United States who ascribe to al-Qaeda-type beliefs.”

Good God Almighty Janet, you’re just figuring that out NOW?

Where the hell have you been?

We have nowhere near the access to information that you do.

We have been talking about it for months, you are just coming to realize it now?

Maybe if you were one of our subscribers you wouldn’t be so far behind the curve.

OK Ms. Napolitano, we gave you the information.

Do you also need us to explain to you what your next step is?

As you said Janet, information sharing is important.

So the next time you need to know something, pay us a visit.

We are always glad to help.

And based on your statements, and by allowing these sort of things to take place on American soil, you need all the help you can get.

News And Views 10-10-09

All the news you need to know.
The only place you need to go.

Fighting starts over Obama prize

DNC humor Czar has no sense of humorFinally,someone speaks out in defense of Glenn Beck

Wht the GOP should give O a prize

Dems change stance on miltary and Afghanistan

DHS Is Not Invited To Terrorist Convention In Obama’s Hometown

Recently, nearly 500 members of Hizb-Ut-Tahrir held a convention in a Chicago-area Hilton Hotel.

Although not officially recognized as a terrorist organization by the State Department, many terrorism experts, one example of which is shown in the video appearing a little later in this article, consider them to be more of a threat to America’s security than al-Qaeda.

The man appearing in the video, Walid Phares, explains how Hizb-Ut-Tahrir  trains youth between the ages of 9 to 18 in the ideology of “Khilafah”, which is a fundamental belief in the rule of Islamic law no matter what the means that may be taken to achieve it.

A spokesman for  the group, Mohammad Malkawi claims that the group condemns terrorism in any form.

That statement would appear to be at odds with actions taken by some of the groups alumni, such as Khalid Skeikh Mohammed, the alleged plotter of the 9-11 attacks, to name just one.

Watch the video:

Malkawi also made the statement that the objective of the group is”To create an Islamic state of Khilafah in the Muslim world.”

“The Muslim world.”

Last time we checked, Chicago was not the heartland of the Muslim world.

Of course, none of this will come as a surprise to our regular readers and subscribers.

Back in April, we reported on how Jihadist terror cells have been training right here on American soil.

We pointed out that there are at least 35 of these terror cells in our country, such as a 50 acre compound in Virginia, or another camp in New York that calls itself “Islamberg”.

We also made mention of reports revealing that al-Shabab, a radical Islamic group based in Somalia that has ties to al-Qaeda as well as Somali pirates were recruting young men from Minnesota to become part of their piracy network.

All of us are left wondering where is Janet Napolitano and the rest of the Department of Homeland Security while all of this is going on.

What sort of death and destruction will have to befall America before Ms. Napolitano and her crew at the DHS recognize that perhaps a convention of 500 supporters of a radical Islamic ideology, as well as numerous terrorist training camps scattered across America are the true “potential domestic terrorists?”

Any of you wondering why a Hilton hotel would host such a convention, visit our friend Pamela at Atlas Shrugs.

Rachel Maddow Destroys Obama On Lying To The American People

(Kudos to readers Erica and AJ for the heads-up on this.)

The tide, if ever so slightly, may be starting to turn.

The wheels may be coming off of the HOPE AND CHANGE wagon.

If, a few short months ago, you had tried telling me that the day would come when such a dedicated liberal as Rachel Maddow would be pointing out the outright lies and deceptions of Barack Obama, I would have been concerned for your mental health.

I seldom. if ever, find myself in agreement with her positions on a particular issue, but in this cas she is spot-on.

In the video below, she of course starts out by taking her obligitory cheap shots at George Bush and Dick Cheney, but then she has the audacity to question the Gospel according to the Messiah.

Watch the video, then see my analysis as to what I think Obama might really be saying:

“Prolonged Detention.”
“Preventative Incarceration.”
“An abiding confidence in the rule of law.”
“Reshape the standards.”

Once you get past the hypocrisy of President Obama proposing the very thing that he condemned the Bush administration for, you may think that this policy, applied to Islamic terrorists, would be acceptable.

However, keep in mind that the un-Constitutional powers that Obama is seeking, once made law, may not be limited to Islomofascists.

Such laws could be used against “potential domestic terrorists.”

Janet Napolitano has her list ready, and is all set to start checking off names.

I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if my my name and Salvaterra’s are on it.

And as far as Rachel Maddow is concerned, I applaud her for pointing out the hypocrisy of Barack Obama, yet at the same time I am a bit concerned for her.

Because her statement that this is “One of the most radical proposals for defying the Constitution that we have ever heard made to the American people” just may prompt the Department of Homeland Security to add her name to the list.

The Civil Defense Versus Obama’s Army

Most of you reading this are probably not old enough to recognize the image attached to this article, or what it once stood for.
We’ll get back to that in a minute.

Some of you may recall that during the Presidential campaign, Barack Obama made the claim that “America needs a domestic security force just as strong and just as well funded as our military.”

At the time, I figured that candidate Obama was choosing to ignore the fact that we already have something along those lines, those of us who are sensible know it as the National Guard.

But it turns out that what Mr. Obama had in mind was, in our opinion, his own private army, formed under the pretense of having a domestic group ready to respond in case of a national emergency or terrorist attack.
Again, Mr. Obama, ever hear of the National Guard?

We have written a number of articles about this ludicrous idea, here are just two:

Obama’s Civilian Security Force and the other is  Obama’s Civilian Defense Force Update

Which brings us to the picture we started this article off with.

That picture was the symbol of a now-defunct organization know as The United States Civil Defense.

This was a non-military force, consisting at it’s peak of over 10 million members.

These volunteers were trained, primarily on a local level, to respond to natural disasters, administer first aid, decontaminate after chemical weapons attacks,  and a multitude of other scenarios.
An associated agency’s duties consisted of border patrol and search and rescue missions.

Keep in mind, a trained civilian response team consisting of 10 million members.

To get a better idea of how critical this agency was once considered to America’s internal security, if you ever happen to attend a to attend a classic car show, and happen to spot a 40’s to early 60’s car equipped with the original radio, you will see the CD symbol on the radio dial, so people could tune in for critical announcements and updates.

But, as with all good things, government interference and the fed’s usual hair brained ideas that “we can make this work better”
led to this bastion of Americans trained to help fellow Americans faded away/was folded into the federal bureaucracy.

And despite what Janet Napolitan and her minions at the Department of Homeland Security would have you believe, the United States no longer has any group as well trained or containing nearly the measurement of the Civil Defense in it’s heyday.

So, how does this differ from what President Obama envisions?

Obama wants to recruit high school and college students to serve a term of duty in AmeriCorps.
These kids would be shipped off to various locations, housed in a barracks-style setting, issued uniforms (didn’t someone else in history do something like that? I wonder if the shirts would still be brown?), and “trained” in emergency response techniques.

Feeling safer now?

As  opposed  to the  old Civil Defense, of which I can provide a first-hand account of how well they performed the duties they were trained to do.

Bear with me, as I have to go into some detail in order to illustrate my point.

Years ago, the area where I grew up went through a flood that is still ranked as one of the worst natural disasters in American history.

As fate would have it, the area where I lived, as well as that town’s National Guard Armory, were out of the areas affected by the flooding.

A friend and I happened to be standing in my front yard when all of a sudden a military jeep pulled up in front of the house and the soldier asked me my name.

Upon learning that I was who he was looking for, he asked me to get in, and for my friend to come along.

We returned to the armory where the Scoutmaster of my Boy Scout troop, who also happened to be the head of the local Civil Defense unit, was, along with the members of his group, working with the Guard unit on disaster relief.
He had overheard one of the members of the Guard unit saying that  they were unable to get blankets, food, and water to one section of the town because the only road to it was flooded out.

When my friend and I walked in, he asked me “Carl, do you know of a way to get to Avondale Hill?”

I told him that I did, but it would involve driving through some old abandoned strip mines.

Fifteen minutes later, my buddy was in one jeep and I was in another, leading the soldiers along this route  to take  much needed supplies to people who couldn’t be reached any other practical way.

Yes, I realize that for some of you, especially the ones who have never heard of it, something on the order of the Civil Defense sounds kind of old-fashioned.

However, if you were to find yourself in an area hit by a natural disaster, or, God forbid, a terrorist attack, who would you rather have available to turn to for help?

The National Guard being on hand is a given, regardless of Obama’s feelings, they are always ready to step up when they are called.

But who would you rather have providing them assistance?

A group of well trained, mature. local individuals, volunteers  who know the area where they are working to try and return life to normal?
People who know of the local citizens and resources to turn to to get a task accomplished in a time of crisis?

Or a bunch of out-of-the-area high school kids who, although they miss being at home playing their video games, for most of whom their biggest concern is how much money they will receive towards college tuition for being part of Obama’s Army?

Next Page »