It’s Time For The “Birthers” To Face Reality

The controversy goes on.

“Birthers”, as the people who claim that Barack Omaba has failed to produce proof that he is a natural-born U.S. citizen, and therfore is not Constitutionally eligible to be President, refuse to give up their fight.

And they are relentless.

Many of them claim he was not actually born in Hawaii, that the Certification of Live Birth he has produced is not a valid birth certificate, and some claim that any documents he has produced are forgeries.

Others have attempted to point out the differences between a Birth Certificate vs. a Cetificate of Live Birth vs. a Certification of Live Birth.

Some major websites, such as World Net Daily, dedicate a majority of their coverage to the Obama eligibility issue.

Numerous well-known attorneys, such as Phillip Berg and Orly Taitz have filed a multitude of lawsuits and legal briefs on their own behalf as well as on the behalf  of various others who have questioned Obama’s eligibility.

We here at the Freedom Medium very briefly examined this issue a few months ago, and came to the conclusion that it wasn’t something that was worth pursuing.

The “birthers” have yet to learn this lesson.

A dismissal of an Obama eligibilty challenge at a California court this week is just the latest setback to those who question Obama’s eligibility to be President.

Yet this will surely fail to deter them.

However, the question remains, just what are these folks hoping to accomplish?

The obvious answer, of course, is Barack Obama’s removal as President.

This is why we say it’s time for the birthers to face reality.

The odds of that happening are astronomical.

Not to mention the Constitutional crisis and the civil unrest that would surely take place were such an event to occur.

Bottom line is, as I said earlier, it simply isn’t going to happen.

And even if it did, really, is Joe Biden any better?

Biden is so stupid that he couldn’t spell “Cat” if you spotted him the c and the t.

Everyone’s attention, birthers and non-birthers alike, would be better focused on undoing the bigger mistake that took place in 2008, which was giving Obama a Congress filled with people of the same socialist mindset as him.

We have a chance to correct that mistake in 2010.

What America needs is a Congress controlled by true conservatives, people who will not rubber-stamp every hair-brained scheme our President comes up with.

It’s also a much more realistic goal.

We here at the Freedom Medium plan on being a huge part of that effort.

And towards that end, we ask for your feedback, as well as suggestions, regarding our site dedicated to this goal, Vote 2010

Become a part of our fight to Take Back America.

Birth Certificate Vs. Certification Of Live Birth

We just did a story bringing to light how the U.S. Army revoked the orders of a Major scheduled to deploy to Afghanistan after he filed a lawsuit claiming that the deployment would be illegal due to the fact that Barack Obama has failed to produce a birth certificate, therefore he has not proven his eligibility to be Commander-In-Chief.

To say that we started a firestorm would be putting it mildly.

We had our fair share of rational responses, as well as the usual off-topic comments, accusations of being right-wing nuts, etc.
As well as a few that were too obscene to put into print.

It turns out that our theory that the document presented by Obama appears to be homemade has some support, in that it seems that there is a difference between a “Certification of Live Birth” as opposed to a “Certificate of Live Birth.”

Our friend Pamela at Atlas Shrugs also presents a compelling case that the document presented as proof that Obama is a natural-born American citizen is indeed a forgery.

And for you Obamanites who claim that there is no difference between a Certification of Live Birth and a Birth Certificate, we, as well as the State of Hawaii, would have to disagree with you.

Pay close attention to the following Hawaiian legal statute:

“[§338-17.8]  Certificates for children born out of State. 
(a)  Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(b)  Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate.  The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.
(c)  The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]”

Everybody get that?

As long as an adult can walk into Hawaii’s version of the Department of Records and provide proof that they are a legal resident of Hawaii, the document is issued.

The child, on the other hand, could have been born in Hawaii, Kenya, or a back-alley in Budapest.

How much more proof do you disciples of the Messiah need before you will admit that there are legitimate reasons to demand answers on this issue?

Of course the fact that Obama may have been elected to our nation’s highest office in direct violation of the United States Constitution is not something that would greatly trouble a dedicated Kool-Aid drinker.