Democrats, Not “Birthers”, Asking If Obama Is Eligible To Serve

All of a sudden, Democrats, not “birthers”, are asking about Obama’s birth  certificate.

During this year’s U.S. Senate races, it will be Democrats raising the issue of President Obama’s eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.

Politico reported Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee chief Robert Menendez is distributing a memo to U.S. Senate campaign offices stating Democrats need to demand that their opponents answer a series of questions, including, “Do you believe that Barack Obama is a U.S. citizen?”

The report said Menendez wants to use the questions to “frame” opponents and “drive a wedge” between moderates belonging to the GOP and those who have adopted the tea party standards advocating limited government,  fewer regulations and more freedom for Americans.

The Democrat memo said, “Given the pressure Republican candidates feel from the extreme right in their party, there is a critical – yet time-sensitive – opportunity for Democratic candidates.

“We have a finite window when Republicans candidates will feel susceptible to the extremists in their party. Given the urgent nature of this dynamic, we suggest an aggressive effort to get your opponents on the record.”

Read the rest of this entry

It’s Time For The “Birthers” To Face Reality

The controversy goes on.

“Birthers”, as the people who claim that Barack Omaba has failed to produce proof that he is a natural-born U.S. citizen, and therfore is not Constitutionally eligible to be President, refuse to give up their fight.

And they are relentless.

Many of them claim he was not actually born in Hawaii, that the Certification of Live Birth he has produced is not a valid birth certificate, and some claim that any documents he has produced are forgeries.

Others have attempted to point out the differences between a Birth Certificate vs. a Cetificate of Live Birth vs. a Certification of Live Birth.

Some major websites, such as World Net Daily, dedicate a majority of their coverage to the Obama eligibility issue.

Numerous well-known attorneys, such as Phillip Berg and Orly Taitz have filed a multitude of lawsuits and legal briefs on their own behalf as well as on the behalf  of various others who have questioned Obama’s eligibility.

We here at the Freedom Medium very briefly examined this issue a few months ago, and came to the conclusion that it wasn’t something that was worth pursuing.

The “birthers” have yet to learn this lesson.

A dismissal of an Obama eligibilty challenge at a California court this week is just the latest setback to those who question Obama’s eligibility to be President.

Yet this will surely fail to deter them.

However, the question remains, just what are these folks hoping to accomplish?

The obvious answer, of course, is Barack Obama’s removal as President.

This is why we say it’s time for the birthers to face reality.

The odds of that happening are astronomical.

Not to mention the Constitutional crisis and the civil unrest that would surely take place were such an event to occur.

Bottom line is, as I said earlier, it simply isn’t going to happen.

And even if it did, really, is Joe Biden any better?

Biden is so stupid that he couldn’t spell “Cat” if you spotted him the c and the t.

Everyone’s attention, birthers and non-birthers alike, would be better focused on undoing the bigger mistake that took place in 2008, which was giving Obama a Congress filled with people of the same socialist mindset as him.

We have a chance to correct that mistake in 2010.

What America needs is a Congress controlled by true conservatives, people who will not rubber-stamp every hair-brained scheme our President comes up with.

It’s also a much more realistic goal.

We here at the Freedom Medium plan on being a huge part of that effort.

And towards that end, we ask for your feedback, as well as suggestions, regarding our site dedicated to this goal, Vote 2010

Become a part of our fight to Take Back America.

Hawaii Tells The President Of The United States To Go To Hell

Our recent post, Obama And His Birth Certificate Are About To Make History, as of the time this is being written, has received over 19,000 hits.

Lots of interest in this issue, both for and against our point of view.

A common thread among the comments that this article has received, as well as on hundreds of other websites is that the reason Obama hasn’t released his long-form birth certificate is that Hawaii won’t give it to him.

Do these people seriously believe that the man holding the title of President of the United States, a man who can appoint staffers to high-level government positions without Congressional approval, who can issue Presidential pardons, and who can, simply by picking up a phone, launch a nuclear missle strike against any place on Earth, cannot get the state of Hawaii to release his original birth certificate?

How delusional does someone have to be to believe that?

Another common claim from the people who have overdosed on Kool-Aid is that he is simply choosing not to release his original birth certificate because a court has not forced him to do so.

Perhaps these people are correct.
Obama won’t put this matter to rest because no court has forced him to do so.

Of course, that fails to explain the over one million dollars the political action committee Obama For America has spent fighting the numerous lawsuits that have been brought hoping to force Obama to produce this document.

It also shows a total disdain for the wishes of the American public, as over 400,000 people have signed World Net Daily’s online petition requesting public release of Barack Obama’s birth certificate.

If over 400,00 people have put their names to a petition asking to see this information, probably 10 to a hundred times as many also wish for it.

However, even if the number is not 40 million but indeed is four hundred thousand, that is a very large segment of the American public for the President to ignore.
Perhaps a large enough segment to spell the difference between victory and defeat the next time he runs.

This lack of action also ignores the possible national security implications of Obama’s failure to address this issue.

Recently, World Net Daily broke the story of Army Major Stefan Cook, whose orders to deploy to Afghanistan were revoked after he claimed that he should not be required to serve under a President who has not proven his eligibility for office.

We are still researching the ultimate effect this may have on the member’s of America’s armed forces, as well as any possible Constitutional consequences.

However, the fact that the military revoked a soldier’s deployment orders based opon the man’s claim that the President has failed to prove that he is the legitimate Commander-In-Chief should be more than enough to make any rational person think twice.

The bottom line is this.

Never before in the history of America has such a question been raised.

And the American public deserves an answer, not from supporters or opponents, but from the President himself.

Birth Certificate Vs. Certification Of Live Birth

We just did a story bringing to light how the U.S. Army revoked the orders of a Major scheduled to deploy to Afghanistan after he filed a lawsuit claiming that the deployment would be illegal due to the fact that Barack Obama has failed to produce a birth certificate, therefore he has not proven his eligibility to be Commander-In-Chief.

To say that we started a firestorm would be putting it mildly.

We had our fair share of rational responses, as well as the usual off-topic comments, accusations of being right-wing nuts, etc.
As well as a few that were too obscene to put into print.

It turns out that our theory that the document presented by Obama appears to be homemade has some support, in that it seems that there is a difference between a “Certification of Live Birth” as opposed to a “Certificate of Live Birth.”

Our friend Pamela at Atlas Shrugs also presents a compelling case that the document presented as proof that Obama is a natural-born American citizen is indeed a forgery.

And for you Obamanites who claim that there is no difference between a Certification of Live Birth and a Birth Certificate, we, as well as the State of Hawaii, would have to disagree with you.

Pay close attention to the following Hawaiian legal statute:

“[§338-17.8]  Certificates for children born out of State. 
(a)  Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(b)  Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate.  The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.
(c)  The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]”

Everybody get that?

As long as an adult can walk into Hawaii’s version of the Department of Records and provide proof that they are a legal resident of Hawaii, the document is issued.

The child, on the other hand, could have been born in Hawaii, Kenya, or a back-alley in Budapest.

How much more proof do you disciples of the Messiah need before you will admit that there are legitimate reasons to demand answers on this issue?

Of course the fact that Obama may have been elected to our nation’s highest office in direct violation of the United States Constitution is not something that would greatly trouble a dedicated Kool-Aid drinker.

Obama And His Birth Certificate Are About To Make History

OK, I confess, the title is a bit misleading.

It should read Obama And His Lack Of  A Birth Certificate Is About To Make History.

Yesterday, World Net Daily broke the story of Army Major Stefan Cook, who argued that he should not have to deploy to Afghanistan because President Obama has not proven that he is a natural-born citizen, therefore he is unable to serve as Commander-In-Chief.

This is something that will receive little, if any, coverage from the mainstream media.

However, the fact that the U.S. Army revoked the orders of a soldier about to be sent overseas based wholly upon such a claim is unprecedented.

This controversy over Obama’s failure to produce a valid birth certificate has been an ongoing saga.

And all calls for him to do so have either been belittled or ignored by the White House.
Which may lead some folks to suspect that the reason he doesn’t simply produce the blasted thing and put this story to rest once and for all is because he doesn’t have one!

About the only attention we have seen regarding this issue was the presentation of a “Certification Of Live Birth” supposedly issued by the State of Hawaii.

This proves less than nothing, as first, to look at it you would think that a 12-year old made it on their home computer, and secondly is the fact that a child does not have to be born in Hawaii in order for the state to issue such a document to the child’s parents.

Even if this document is legitimate, it is a far cry from an actual birth certificate, and it surely is not proof of where Obama was actually born.

However , there are literally thousands of articles and opinions floating around about Obama’s birth certificate, or lack therof, and I don’t want to bore you with re-visiting the same stories.

Rather, I would like to expound on my claim that Obama’s lack of a birth certificate will make history.
Consider the following:

If indeed it is proven that Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen, and therefore is unable to serve as President, he will not be remembered as America’s first black President, rather history will remember him as the man who was the cause of the biggest Constitutional crisis this country has ever seen!

The question will be raised of what will happen to other troops deployed by Obama, and the troops already serving under orders from an ineligible commander in chief.

Every piece of legislation that Obama has signed since taking office would now be considered under law to be null and void.

Imagine what this would mean to the stock market, financial institutions, the auto industry, as well as every other facet of the American economy.

Not to mention, the people who already accuse the president’s critics of being racists will no doubt try to use this as their proof and stoke racial tensions to the point of riot.

Every appointment he has made, regardless if it was an appointment as a “Czar’, or a Cabinet-level position, would have to be overturned, and it would become the duty of the Vice-President to re-fill those positions.

Which leads to perhaps the most intriguing scenario of all.

The Constitution states that if the President is unable to serve, the Vice-President shall assume the duties of the office.

However, if the man who chose you to be his running mate was found to have been elected to the office in violation of Constitutional law, where does that leave you Mr. Biden?

After all, we (well, some of you poor misguided individuals) voted for the two of you as a team running on the same ticket.

So if it is found that the man who picked you to be his running mate did so in direct violation of federal law, doesn’t it follow that you were also elected to the Vice-Presidency under false pretenses?

Barack Obama.
CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN!

When the U.S. military accepts the claim of a soldier that the man posing as Commander-In-Chief has failed to produce his eligibility to hold that title, we may be on the verge of seeing change beyond belief.