We had Van Jones, the communist/9-11 conspiracy wackjob Green Jobs Czar.

Then Obama added Kevin Jennings, the homosexual statutory rape advocating Safe Schools Czar.

Then we met Science Czar John Holdren, who favors government-decreed abortions and mandatory sterilization.

Today we are going to take our first look at Obama’s Regulatory Czar, the wildest one so far, Cass Sunstein.

We say first look because this guy is so far out of touch with what most sane and rational people think that we simply couldn’t cover him in one single article.

So in this report we are going to take a look at Cass Sunstein’s bid to replace Ezekiel Emanuel as the Angel Of Death of the Obama administration.

On second thought, perhaps they are working together.

Emanuel wants to withhold medical treatment from “non-productive” members of society.

And Sunstein doesn’t feel it’s necessary to wait for someone to die before deciding to remove their organs.

Sounds like something out of an old movie about Nazi concentration camps doesn’t it?

If only that were the case.

In his 2008 book “Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health,Wealth And Happiness”, Sunstein had this to say regarding the issue of organ donation:

“The state owns the rights to body parts of people who are dead or in certain hopeless conditions, and it can remove their organs without asking anyone’s permission.”
“Though it may sound grotesque, routine removal is not impossible to defend.”
“In theory, it would save lives, and it would do so without intruding on anyone who has any prospect for life.”

So if top members of the Obama administration have their way, if I have a loved one who is terminally ill, not only will they be denied treatment, but the decision to harvest their organs, while they are still alive, can be made without my permission?

If that is the case, I would strongly suggest an additional provision to Obama’s health care reform bill.

And that would be to make sure that I am handcuffed to a chair with a gun held to my head before you try it.

And she’s letting the President know about it in no uncertain terms.

In spite of the fact that President Obama is considering a health care reform bill without a public option, Pelosi is insisting it be part of the package.

In a recent statement,Pelosi made the following claim:

“A bill without a strong public option will not pass the House.”
“Any real change requires the inclusion of a strong public option to promote competition and bring down costs.  If a vigorous public option is not included, it would be a major victory for the health insurance industry.”

She then went on to say that the month of August has brought distortions from people who want “to try to kill this historic legislation.”

And on that last part she is right on the money.

I haven’t seen such a public uproar since the days of the anti Vietnam War protestors.

There is one thing she is overlooking.

The reason people are speaking out to kill this “historic” piece of legislation is because it is a historically poorly written piece of legislation.

There are numerous versions of the same basic bill floating around the House, and there are significant differences between them.

So how can the White House possibly expect the American public to embrace health care reform when the members of his own party aren’t even in agreement?

Or when the Speaker Of The House is basically telling the President “Hey, if I don’t get what I want, you don’t have a snowballs chance in hell of getting what you want.

And they still can’t figure out that opposition to this proposal is not coming only from Republicans?

Until such time as they can stop arguing with each other, and present the American public with a rational alternative to the current system,opposition will continue to grow.

And even if they manage to do that, they still have to overcome the public’s deeply held belief that anything the government touches, it screws up.

That will prove to be an even bigger battle.

That bucolic little state that kept electing a man to the Senate even after he was responsible for the death of a young woman.

The state that gave us a Presidential candidate, a potential Commander-In-Chief who threw away his own medals and claimed that anyone serving in the military was stupid.

So, now that Ted is dead and Kerry is not so merry, what is your next move?

It’s obvious, you tear up the United States Constitution and take the first steps towards turning your state into a modern-day version of Nazi Germany.

The Massachusetts State Senate recently passed the “Pandemic Response Bill 2028″ and it is now awaiting approval by the House.

A piece of legislation that would make Adolph Hitler proud, and would bring a smile to the face of Josef Mengle, the bill is being described as a public safety measure in the event of a swine flu outbreak.

Let’s take a look at some of the Gestapo-type powers this bill imposes:

It requires the owner of a home or business to allow entry into the premises.
Unlawful search and seizure be damned.

To collect specimens and perform tests on any animal, living or deceased.
Remember, humans are technically animals.
I can hear the words of the Angel of Death right now.
“Ach, this specimen is thrashing about. Obersturmhuhrer, come hold this woman down while I give her an injection.”

Medical personnel may decide they want to perform tests on or vacinate and individual.

If the person refuses, they are subject to involuntry transportation, and be detained and quarantined.

Just a suggestion, but if you are a follower of Christian Scientist beliefs, better get the hell out of Massachusetts.

All of you should be aware that the things outlined here a just the tip of the iceberg.

Click here to see the full text of the Pandemic Response Bill.

While you’re there, take note of the fact that these actions do not require a search or arrest warrant.

One final thing.

To those of you who will send us comments stating that we are just going overboard, or are blowing this out of proportion, do something first.

READ THE BILL!!

And if you still fail to see the numerous provisions of the Constitution that this thing violates, if you still cannot see the utter disregard for civil liberties, do us and all of America a favor.

Get yourself a vaccination.

Not against the swine flu.

Against being terminally stupid.

Now that there has been such an uproar of his health care reform “death panel”, and that some of the terms of the Quality Adjusted Remaing Years (QARY) provision are being exposed, old swifty Barack has pulled another rabbit out of his hat.

IMAC, the Independent Medicare Advisory Council, which would give the government the power to determine “reasonable and (cost) effective” methods of medical treatment.

IMAC would place no restrictions on the government’s ability to “mandate coverage, reimbursment, cost-effectiveness”, etc. to any public or private payer.

Now, I don’t expect that any members of the Kool-Aid Brigade seeing this can be bothered by a dose of reality, but for the rest of you, click here to see the IMAC legislation now before Congress

Better start working the phones and fax machines people, if this thing passes it’s provisions go into effect within 30 days.

Otherwise, the next time you hear and old person say “I’m dying”, the next voice you hear will be:

“I’m from the government, and I’m here to help!”

They make this claim in spite of the bill containing QARY terminology.

QARY is an angel of death acronym for Quality Adjusted Remaining Years.

And what it boils down to is that how much money will be spent on an elder or disabled person’s medical treatment is going to be determined, not by that person’s doctor, but by a government panel which will determine if spending the money for treatment is justified based on an estimate of how many years of life that person has left.

I recently heard one member of the Kool-Aid Brigade make the statement that Congress would never allow such a thing to happen in the United States of America.

So how do all of these Josef Mengele death squad wannabes explain how the case of Barbara Wagner, who was told that the state would not provide funding for her chemotherapy, but would put up the funding for assisted suicide?

How would all of you Kool-Aid drinkers feel if this was your mother?

And how many of you are really stupid enough to believe that such a thing won’t happen under Obama’s plan?

How many of you supporting this boondoggle of a “reform” bill are really sure that you won’t watch a family member be denied treatment if it passes?

Are you sure enough to bet a loved ones life on it?

Michelle Obama  is on unpaid leave from her $317,000 a year job as a vice-president of the University Of Chicago Medical Center.

She was making a mere $122,000 a year just before her husband got elected to the Senate.
Before she went on leave, Mrs. Obama was instrumental in having the hospital adopt a program known as the Urban Health Initiative.

The purpose of the plan is to steer people who don’t have adequate health insurance to other care facilities.
Opinion polls taken among Chicago area medical professionals at the time the plan was put into effect were highly critical, calling the plan a break with the medical center’s commitment to the community.

Many doctors also noted that the treatment the people turned away would receive would be inadequate, stating that the level of care at local medical clinics left much to be desired.

Barack Obama’s top political strategist, David Axelrod, co-owns the firm, ASK Public Strategies, who, after some urging from Michelle Obama, was hired by the hospital to try and sell the plan to the community as a better alternative.
Another Obama adviser and close friend, Dr. Eric Whitaker, took over the Urban Health Initiative when he was hired by the hospital.

So the man who is going to see to it that we all have access to top-notch health care is married to a woman who advocated a plan for the hospital she worked at to deny first-class health care to those who need it the most.

Can someone reading this please explain this to me?
Who will judge what level of health care someone receives?

Doctors, Barack Obama, government bureaucrats, Michelle Obama, David Axelrod, Nancy “you’re a bunch of Nazis” Pelosi, who??

And which combination of their third-rate medical plans will we end up with?

The White House has put that tactic to good use over the last few days.

Under mounting public opposition to the health care reform bill now before Congress, Barack Obama has backed off on both the “end of life counseling” provision as well as changing his tune on the “public option” section of the bill.

And if the American public falls for this ploy, it will prove to be a disaster.

No matter what phrasing Obama cares to use, this bill as it is written will STILL leave the government and federal bureaucrats in charge of overseeing the quality of health care that you receive.

Your health care will still be rationed, as there is simply no realistic way to provide medical coverage to upwards of 50 million people who are not covered now (many of them non-taxpaying illegal immigrants) without cutting back on services.

By cutting hundreds of billions of dollars from Medicare reimbursement spending, doctors and hospitals will simply perform less procedures such as EKG testing, MRI’s, etc.

And it only stands to reason that once the government sees that it is spending less on Medicare treatment, this policy will trickle down to all aspects of health care, regardless of a person’s age.

And if cutting Medicare spending doesn’t work, Obama still has a plan in place to help Grandma and Grandpa shuffle off of this earth a little sooner.

Under the Quality-Adjusted-Remaining-Years provision, the elderly, the disabled and the mentally challenged will still die a little sooner, but the method of bumping them off will seem to be more charitable.

QARY will analyze the cost of a procedure and weigh that cost against the possible “quality remaning years of life” expected out of the person who needs the procedure.

So when doctors have to make a choice between open-heart surgery for a man in his 30’s and chemotherapy for a cancer patient in her 60’s, take a guess as to who moves to the front of the line.

And as far as someone who is disabled, don’t even bother to ask.

As Ezekiel “Doctor Death” Emanuel says, why waste resources on people who have little chance of becoming productive citizens?

The White House is manuvering to dress up one of the worst pieces of legislation in American history in new clothes so that we all want to take it out to dinner.

President Obama, you said it yourself and you should keep it in mind:

You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig.

Free Speech!

What the hell is that?

You can’t question me, I’m the Messiah, I mean the President!!

US President Barack Obama on Friday blamed headline-hungry television networks for enflaming an ugly backlash by foes of his top priority effort to offer health care to all Americans.

A combative Obama also accused health insurance firms of holding sick Americans “hostage” as he launched a weekend tour of mountain west states Montana, Colorado and Arizona where suspicion of Washington runs deep.

“I know there’s been a lot of attention paid to some of the town hall meetings that are going on around the country, especially when tempers flare,” Obama said, at his own event with 1,300 people in an airport hangar.

“TV loves a ruckus,” said Obama and then joked: “you’ve got to be careful about those cable networks.”

US news channels have been looping ferocious confrontations at town hall meetings held by lawmakers during their summer recess where voters have accused Obama of plotting a “socialized” takeover of the private health system.

But the president argued…Read the rest of this entry

Come on now!

Even the people in ACORN aren’t that gullible.

Don’t strain the system. Don’t add to the national stress level. Don’t pierce when you can envelop. Don’t show even understandable indignation when you can show legitimate regard. Realize that the ties that bind still bind but have grown dryer and more worn with time. They need to be strengthened, not strained.

Govern knowing we are a big, strong, mighty nation, a colossus that is, however, like all highly complex, highly wired organisms, fragile, even at places quite delicate. Don’t overburden or overexcite the system. America used to have fringes, one over here and the other over there. The fringes are growing. The fringes have their own networks. All sorts of forces exist to divide us. Try always to unite.

These are things one always wants people currently rising in government to know deep in their heads and hearts. They are the things the young, fierce staffers in any new White House, and the self-proclaimed ruthless pragmatists in this one, need to hear, be told or be reminded of.

The big, complicated, obscure, abstruse, unsettling and ultimately unhelpful health-care plans, proposals and ideas keep rolling out of Washington. Five bills, thousands of pages, “as it says on page 346, paragraph 3, subsection D.” No one knows what will be passed, what will make its way through House-Senate “conference.” They don’t even know what the president wants, what his true agenda is. He never seems to be leveling, only talking. Everything’s open to misdirection and exaggeration, and everything, people fear, will come down to some future bureaucrat’s interpretation of paragraph 3, subsection D, part 22.

What a disaster this health-care debate is. It strains…Read the rest of this entry

Don’t raise your voice.

And whatever you do, don’t ask legitimate questions.

The White House press office is now Miss Manners’ office. President Obama’s press secretary Robert Gibbs took to the television airwaves this week to criticize congressional town hall protesters for “yelling.” Gibbs’ underling, Bill Barton, chastised voters not to “disrupt” and “scream.” Instead, he advised America to engage in a “spirited debate about health care, a real vigorous conversation about it.”

What constitutes “spirited?” How do they define “vigorous?” When does forceful dissent become intolerable disruption? Herewith, the Obama Etiquette Czar’s Official Rules for Patriotic Protest. Keep this guide with you at all times to avoid being flagged by the Democrat politeness monitors.

*No shouting. Congressional representatives cannot sell Obamacare with mobs of unruly senior citizens and small business owners interrupting to press them on specific sections of the bill. Limit your objections to a library whisper (30dB or less) and only…Read the rest of this entry