Al Gore Banned In Britain

England’s UK Independence Party is behind a movement to ban global warming propaganda films like Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” from being shown in public schools.

They are also promising to launch a Royal Commission led by a High Court judge to investigate the causes of climate change.

Recent breaking scandals such as Climategate, where emails  from the University of East Anglia showed that scientists were willing to manipulate the data about global warming, and Glaciergate, which was the name given to the claim (that they later retracted) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that the Himalayan glaciers could melt by 2035, have led many to question if human activity has any effect on climate change.

Shining A Different Light On Global Warming

 

A steady drip of errors in the top report on global warming — and the erosion they are causing in public confidence of the science behind it — have some scientists calling for drastic changes in how future United Nations climate reports are done. 

A push for reform being published in Thursday’s issue of the prestigious scientific journal Nature comes on top of a growing clamor for the resignation of the chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The work of the climate change panel, or IPCC, is often portrayed as one massive tome. But it really is four separate reports on different aspects of global warming, written months apart by distinct groups of scientists.

No errors have surfaced in the first and most well-known of the reports, which said the physics of a warming atmosphere and rising seas is man-made and incontrovertible. So far, four mistakes have been discovered in the second report, which attempts to translate what global warming might mean to daily lives around the world.

“A lot of stuff in there was just not very good,” said Kevin Trenberth, head of climate analysis at the National Center for Atmospheric Research and a lead author of the first report. “A chronic problem is that on the whole area of impacts, getting into the realm of social science, it is a softer science. The facts are not as good.”

It’s been a dismal winter for climate scientists after the high point of winning the 2007 Nobel, along with former Vice President Al Gore, for championing efforts to curb global warming and documenting its effects.

–In November, stolen private e-mails from a British university climate center embarrassed a number of scientists for their efforts to stonewall climate skeptics. The researchers were found to have violated Britain’s Freedom of Information laws.

–In December, the much anticipated climate summit of world leaders in Copenhagen failed to produce a meaningful mandatory agreement to curb greenhouse gases.

–Climate legislation in the United States, considered key to any significant progress in slowing global warming, is stalled.

Read the rest of this entry

Climate Change Experts Are As Inaccurate As Local Meteorologist

The weatherman is at it again.

Big snow on the way.

Last week, some of them were really accurate.

And some of them were dead wrong.

A large portion of the U.S. just experienced a snowstorm of massive proportions.

Is that why it’s now usually called climate change instead of global warming?

Where I live, three local television weatherpersons, both daily newspapers, and the local affiliate of the Weather Channel were predicting snow starting on Friday afternoon and that we would see five to seven inches of snow by Saturday afernoon.

Guess how much time I spent on snow removal that Saturday.

Less than five minutes sweeping a dusting of snow off of my front sidewalk.

That may sound like I got lucky that the storm missed me, until you consider all of the postponements and cancellations of sporting, social and scholastic events, evening college classes canceled, etc.

Consider for a moment how many people had to change or abandon their plans, not to mention the financial ramifications.

Everyone knows that the folks predicting the weather sometimes get it right, and sometimes they get it wrong.
The problems caused failed by the weather prediction for my immediate area is one thing, but what are the ramifications when it happens on a global scale?

And thanks to these environmental jihadists who worship at the altar of Al Gore, nation’s from around the world are spending millions, if not billions, of dollars on climate change summits, attempts to reduce CO2 emissions, and on and on.

Most financial analysts agree that the Cap And Trade bill currently awaiting Congressional approval will inflict a crippling blow on the U.S. economy.

And what is all of this hysteria based upon, besides the manic rantings of Al Gore, a snake oil salesman without any scientific qualifications, who millions of people take as gospel, while overlooking the fact that Gore is making tens of millions of dollars off of his “carbon credits” Ponzi scheme.

Or another intellectual giant, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who in 2008 predicted that, thanks to global warming, there would be no snow or cold in Washington D.C.

I wonder how many people who were stupid enough to believe RFK are feeling about that opinion piece.
Many of them can’t re-read it because over 100,000 of them are without power thanks to thirty inches of snow.

Maybe we should base our climate change fears on the United Nations panel of climate experts who based their claims on an article from a magazine article and a college student’s term paper.

How much attention should any rational human being pay to the findings of the United Nations Climate Chief, who made the statement that global warming skeptics should rub their faces with asbestos.

How about the “scientist” who considered suicide when his  global warming findings were questioned?

Of course, some folks are rational enough to see the talk of climate change for the scam that it is.

My point  is, when a supposed “expert” can’t even  accurately predict the next day’s weather, why should I believe any of the claims of Al Gore and his carbon credit cronies?

Britain’s Prince Charles Joins Forces With Al Gore To Fight Global Warming

England’s Prince Charles.
A jug-eared polo player and full-time buffon who has spent his life living off of the English welfare state, a man so loony that he leaves Princess Diana, one of the most beautiful women ever, to take up with a woman who looks like one of his horses, yet still can’t figure out why the Queen doesn’t think he has the smarts to take over the British throne..

He has become an ally of global warming guru Al Gore.

A charlatan making millions off of his carbon credits crapola, a Ponzi scheme that rivals the Bernie Madoff scam.
A man without a single scientific credential to his name who flies around the world in a private jet, yet wants the rest of us to reduce our carbon footprint by driving a Prius

Prince Charles dismissed critics of climate change science yesterday.
He said evidence of long-term and potentially-irreversible effects was utterly overwhelming, adding: ‘This isn’t an opinion – it is a fact.’
In a bullish speech, the prince joined the row over whether false claims by some experts compromise the case for global warming.
He said: ‘I have watched with growing dismay and alarm the glee with which the sceptics have leapt upon the recent news stories that question the science that climate change is man-made and suggesting it is nothing more than a myth.
‘Well, if it is but a myth, and the global scientific community is involved in some sort of conspiracy, why is it then that around the globe sea levels are more than six inches higher than they were 100 years ago?

‘It is also a fact that atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are 40 per cent higher now than they were before the industrial revolution.’

Prince Charles made the comments on a visit to Manchester’s Museum of Science and Industry where he was launching a campaign to help people lead more environmentally sustainable lives.

He said: ‘To those who seek to persuade us that there is no such thing as climate change, in the face of the now overwhelming peer-reviewed scientific evidence, I would ask just one question  -  are you prepared to take the risk of being wrong?’

Charles said the planet’s poorest would suffer ‘first and worst’ if the problem was not tackled.
Read the rest of this entry

Global Warming Seen As National Security Threat

That claim is included as part of the Quadrennial Defense Review, a report mandated by Congress that updates Pentagon priorities every four years.

An excerpt of the report is cited on the digital library of the Department of Homeland Security.

Pentagon officials conclude that global warming “will act as an “accelerant of instability and conflict.”

The assessment reached in the report is that climate change will, among other factors, increase global poverty, weaken fragile governments, and affect the military’s operating environment.

Myself, I feel that global warming is as much of a national security threat as the tooth fairy.

And for all of you Al Gore disciples who didn’t grasp that analogy, I say that because neither one of them are real.

Copenhagen Trip Cost U.S. Taxpayers Over One Million Dollars

Just one more example of how the Obama administration plans to keep wasteful federal spending under control.
And why in the hell did we need to send 106 people?
And Henry Waxman, at a global warming conference, was complaining that it was cold.

 

Thanks to recently filed Congressional expense reports there’s new light shed on the Copenhagen Climate Summit in Denmark and how much it cost taxpayers.

CBS News Investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports official filings and our own investigation show at least 106 people from the House and Senate attended – spouses, a doctor, a protocol expert and even a photographer.

For 15 Democratic and 6 Republican Congressmen, food and rooms for two nights cost $4,406 tax dollars each. That’s $2,200 a day – more than most Americans spend on their monthly mortgage payment.

CBS News asked members of Congress and staff about whether they’re mindful that it’s public tax dollars they’re spending. Many said they had never even seen the bills or the expense reports.

Read the rest of this entry

UN Climate Report: Errors Were Made

I’m sitting here, staggered by the size of my heating bill, wondering when this global warming thing is going to kick in.

Five glaring errors were discovered in one paragraph of the world’s most authoritative report on global warming, forcing the Nobel Prize-winning panel of climate scientists who wrote it to apologize and promise to be more careful.

The errors are in a 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a U.N.-affiliated body. All the mistakes appear in a subsection that suggests glaciers in the Himalayas could melt away by the year 2035 — hundreds of years earlier than the data actually indicates. The year 2350 apparently was transposed as 2035.

The climate panel and even the scientist who publicized the errors said they are not significant in comparison to the entire report, nor were they intentional. And they do not negate the fact that worldwide, glaciers are melting faster than ever.

But the mistakes open the door for more attacks from climate change skeptics.

“The credibility of the IPCC depends on the thoroughness with which its procedures are adhered to,” Yvo de Boer, head of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, told The Associated Press in an e-mail. “The procedures have been violated in this case. That must not be allowed to happen again because the credibility of climate change policy can only be based on credible science.”

The incident follows a furor late last year over the release of stolen e-mails in which climate scientists talked about suppressing data and freezing out skeptics of global warming. And on top of that, an intense cold spell has some people questioning whether global warming exists.

Read the rest of this entry

Climate Change Isn’t Changing

The deadline to reach a global accord on climate change passed yesterday with barely a whimper from the United Nations.

Although further meeting are scheduled to address the issue, they won’t be taking place until later this year.

In the United States, where the passage of the Cap and Trade bill has been put on the back burner, the Environmental Protection Agency is trying to pass harsher rules regarding greenhouse gases.

One of which is that carbon dioxide poses a danger to health.

So all of you people who talk to your houseplants in the hopes of encouraging their growth, KNOCK IT OFF!

And if the rest of you could try and cut down on exhaling when you breathe, that would be a good thing.

Climategate Protestors Ejected, Al Gore Goes Into Hiding

Circumstances are really turning up the heat on global warming guru Al Gore.

One of America’s biggest hypocrites has just cancelled a speaking engagement at a climate change conference in Copenhagen.

Gore was supposed to be the speaker at a $1,200 per person meet and greet, but suddenly bowed out, citing a “scheduling conflict.” More details on Gore being a no-show and the event being scrubbed from the VisitCopenhagen website can be found here.

It’s just possible that Al “big carbon footprint” Gore was afraid he may have to face the same sort of questions that were posed to him at a recent book signing, as is shown in this video.
(Let it run for a minute or so, it takes a moment to get to the good part.)

He might have been worried that someone questioning his credibility might not be forcibly removed from the event, seeing as how they would have paid twelve hundred dollars to be there.

I wish the questioners has focused more on trying to get some honest answers from Gore, rather than shout out things about the “new world order”, but it is sort of a moot point; when has Gore ever been honest about this global warming farce?

Be sure to take note of the vehicle Gore makes his escape in.

That isn’t a Prius or some other earth-friendly hybrid.

A Reader Calls Me A Bigot…Maybe He’s Right

In an article I did yesterday, I pointed out some of the glaring inconsistencies in the way liberals think, and in what they believe.
You can read the article here.

And of course some liberal lunatic had to leave the following comment:

“It sounds to me like you’ve encountered people such as yourself and assumed they were liberals because their bigotry and bias was a different flavor than yours.”

When I had said at the beginning of the article that liberals were missing a few brain cells, I was being sarcastic.

Now I’m starting to think that I may be onto something.

Because for someone to call me a bigot due to the fact that I point out the hypocrisy in their belief system, they must have a mental disease.

Then, the more I thought about it, according to the sick and twisted liberal viewpoint, what I believe does make me a bigot.

Really, is this the best you people can do?

There has to be at least one liberal out there out there with the moral courage to face an issue head on.

And I’m not talking about you halfwits who’s answer to everything is “Well, George Bush did this” or “Republicans did that.”

Explain to me why I shouldn’t have anything  but disdain for global warming hypocrite Al Gore, who’s lifestyle produces a bigger carbon footprint in a month than I do in a year!
And please don’t give me any of that crap about “carbon credits, the last guy to come up with a Ponzi scheme like that was Bernie Maddoff.

Justify the actions of the ACLU, a group of legal sharks who repeatedly file lawsuits hoping to stop the Boy Scouts of America from receiving any federal funding over the fact that the BSA refuses to have admitted homosexuals as Scoutmasters.
ACORN has received millions of federal dollars more than the Scouts have, is the ACLU suing ACORN for their staffers instructing people an how to make children become child prostitutes?
No?
I didn’t think so.

A few years ago, the ACLU served pro bono as defense counsel for two pieces of human garbage who sodomized and murdered a 9 year old boy.
Guess that’s something to be proud of, huh?

Tell me again why I should support President Obama’s appointment of Kevin Jennings as “Safe Schools Czar.”
A man who turned a blind eye to the homosexual statutory rape of a 15 year old boy.

Those of you living in your liberal fantasy world may find this hard to believe, but I don’t really care how two consenting adults choose to live their lives, or pick their sexual partners.

My problem arises when America’s school system tries to teach children about moral and lifestyle choices.
That is not the job of a schoolteacher, that is the job of a parent.
We who consider ourselves conservatives don’t need you to raise our children for us, we are perfectly capable of doing it on our own.

The holiday season will soon be upon us, and this will compel those on the left to go into one of their favorite rants.

Point out to me where in the United States Constitution the phrase “Separation of Church and State” appears.

Just what is it about Christmas that scares you lefties so much?

“Peace on Earth, Good Will Towards Men” sounds like a pretty good plan to me.

And despite your contempt for any public display of them, when you come right down to it, the Ten Commandments aren’t a bad set of rules to live by.

Please explain to me how Keith Olbermann is more level-headed and fairer than Glenn Beck.
Yet you have nothing but respect for the one, and nothing but contempt for the other.

Clear up for me how many of you are outraged when people in a neighborhood will post signs pointing out that a child molestor has moved into an area.
Are liberals really so mentally sick that they are more concerned with hurting the feelings of a pervert than they are with the safety of young children?

Give me a credible reason why we should think that the government is capable of competently running the health care industry when they foul up almost everything else they put their hands to>
Are we really supposed to believe that our medical records will remain private when a teenage kid can hack into computers at the Pentagon?

I could keep going on with this, but here is the bottom line:

I think that anyone who lives a life of wretched excess while telling me that I have to completelychange my lifestyle because “the earth is in the balance” is nothing more than a money-grubbing hypocrite that is beneath contempt.

I have nothing but disdain for any group of attorneys, no matter what fancy title they choose to give themselves, who defend admitted child molesters and murderers.

If a man wants to have sex with a man, a woman with a woman, or any combination thereof, I don’t care.
But I don’t want the state teaching moral values to my children, that’s a job for myself and my wife.
And if my idea of morality doesn’t mesh with yours, that’s too damn bad.

I fail to see how a Nativity scene on a courthouse lawn will bring about the end of civilization.
Any more than any other religious symbol would.

Please don’t expect me to be delusional enough to believe that pindits such as Sean Hannitty or Michelle Malkin are rabid mad-dog conservatives while in the same breath you try and convince me that Rachel Maddow and Chris Matthews sall them right down the middle.

Not only don’t I want a sexual predator living in my neighborhood, Iwould go out of my way to make things so uncomfortable for such an individual that they would move.
And I would urge the folks in the area that this person moved to to do the same thing.
Would I be violating this persons rights?
Too damn bad.
Because unlike you liberals, I feel that the right of a child to be safe from a molester, or a woman from a rapist, far exceed the rights of a pervert.

I don’t feel that the government has any right whatsoever to dictate the terms of my medical coverage.
A while back I put forth the proposal that anyone who wants to sign on to the President’s health care proposals should be allowed to do so.
And that the feds should leave those of us who are happy with the coverage we have now the hell alone.

All of these things are a part of my belief system.

And if that makes me a bigot, then so be it.

Next Page »