Comments on: We Are Getting A Lot Of Czars Per Obama Now Baby!

By: Juven Bachan

Juven Bachan — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:32:03 +0000

All of the Dems and most of the Repubs in Congress know that Obamao is a socialist / communist and they are not only failing to report it , like it is. Because he is a colored person they are giving him a pass. This political correctness is practiced by these people who suddenly seem to forgot the basis and constitutionality of our Republic as a substitute for the worship of the Obamao mongrel god. This is the same surrender by the Democratic politicians in Germany when they caved in en masse and allowed the monster Hitler to have his way. It is chilling how far this has gone. The American economy is in tatters and this govt sees nothing wrong with hosting a lavish state dinner to welcome the Indian head of state. This Roman banquet in the midst of severe unemployment, shown to homes with nothing on the kitchen tables is a smack down and an affront to the suffering of the American people.

By: carl

carl — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:30:51 +0000

Jude
This is something those of us here have been speaking out about time and time again.
The American public either doesn’t care or is not paying attention.
And until such time as they do (and I pray that it’s soon) the HOGS will continue to take all that they can get.

By: carl

carl — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:28:18 +0000

Gina
I did both a Google and a Wikipedia search to try and find you an answer and was unable to come up with anything definitive.
I think it would be safe to say that they are costing us far more than they are worth.

By: carl

carl — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:26:17 +0000

Michel
Glad that you appreciate the work that we are trying to do.
We promise to keep fighting.

By: jude moriarty

jude moriarty — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:14:00 +0000

While some may find this humorous; in fact this appointing of Czars is more than a bit disconcerting. It is politics on steroids/ plus, oh yawn, unconstitutional. I’ve lost count but I believe the # is somewhere around 35?

Why care? Simply because they are not elected – set policy (see RAT in Detroit taking care of Morgan and Citi) do an end run around ANY oversight, inquiry, by Congress. Fact is these Czars put all the control in the White House/ as they are ONLY answerable to the President. Anybody note this whirlwind of revamping government?

TARP – stimulus – bailing out banks (trillions) Energy (Cap and Trade swindle) – Health Care (Rep and Dems playing Good Cop/Bad Cop when BOTH plans serve Insurance/ big pharma –robbery as usual. This is being done (my opinion) in such HASTE (bills aren’t read or debated) before folks wake up to the fact that this HOPEY – CHANGEY mantra was all scripted nonsense.

Meantime Obama et al are having a GRAND time in the midst of millions out of work – shelters/soup kitchens overwhelmed/ people DYING on ER floors – ongoing 330,000 foreclosures monthly (wait till commercial foreclosures hit). HA and everyone is supposed to go back to community college and get that GREEN Sh*T job at the new going rate (see Detroit) of 12 bucks an hr, NO pensions/ no health benefits.

Those are ONLY for the FRAT/Sorority guys and gals in Foggy Bottom and WE pay 72% of their premium costs/ plus they get YEARLY cost of living (unlike Detroit robbed of their pensions) in their OBSCENE pensions. Huh! How comes our employees are getting better benefits than WE their employers? SHARED sacrifice?

Obama uses Air Force One like a kid with a new golf cart/ he used MORE gas on EARTH DAY than my entire family would use in a lifetime. CAP and TRADE/ a gift to utilities/ big business – as some distant computer SHUTS the electric off – like they did with the 93 year old veteran in Michighan – HE was found FROZEN while Obama turned UP the thermostat in WH to 80.

I’d always thought that leadership demanded compassion and sensitivity to one’s constituents –apparently not. The HOGS in Washington are in it for themselves/

By: Gina

Gina — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:56:40 +0000

Can one tell me where to find the cost to the american public for all of his czars?

By: Michel Janvier

Michel Janvier — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:02:52 +0000

My first visit to the site. Thank you. It appears that there is indeed a movement growing at great speed to try to save what is left of our once great nation. I will indeed be back for your nest update.

By: carl

carl — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:00:05 +0000

Bruce
We are still researching the concerns you brought up, and will have an answer for you in a few days.

By: Bruce Deitrick Price

Bruce Deitrick Price — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:51:21 +0000

As a practical matter, is all of this legal?

As a second practical matter, how much staff and office space does each of these extra appendages use up? At what cost?

As a third practical matter, don’t the czars reveal a disturbing Obama tendency: namely, to create extra-legal, extra-constitutional structures responsible only to him? I think we should oppose these czars for the same reason we oppose Acorn and that horrible civilian corps Obama talked about–as big and well-funded as the military.

By: carl

carl — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:11:07 +0000

Lou
Yes, sometimes i feel the need to try and lighten the mood when trying to make a point at the same time.
As for the 100 Senators:
“Who dares to question the Messiah?”