Obama’s Gangster Government Has Taken Over America

July 20, 2009 · carl · Print This Article

Our regular readers know that we have done a number of articles regarding Obama’s Czars.

And setting aside for a moment that among the people he has appointed to these high-level government positions are Socialists, Communists, ex-health care industry lawyers, a “Science Czar” who won’t even speak to anyone who disputes his theories, and on and on.

So how does tie into our claim of a gangster government taking over America?
Well, think about it.

In the following video, Representative Michele Bachmann points out how, for all intents and purposes, the Federal Government changed General Motors into Government Motors.

Besides the government having a direct hand in forcing car dealerships out of business, these dealerships were compelled to turn over the records containing the names of their sales and service customers.

Sounds like a maneuver you would see in a movie about organized crime.

As far as we have been able to determine, the salaries of Obama’s Czars  are not a matter of public record.

They were not subjected to Senate confirmation hearings before being appointed, and they are not subject to any Congressional oversight, in fact senior Democrat Senator Robert Byrd had this to say regarding czars:

“As Presidential assistants and advisors, these White House staffers are not accountable for their actions to the Congress, to cabinet officials, and to virtually anyone but the President. In too many instances, White House staff have been allowed to inhibit openness and transparency, and reduce accountability.”

That’s Democrat icon Robert Byrd making that statement ladies and gentlemen, not a member of some vast right-wing conspiracy.

So let’s see if we have this right.

Obama has a crew that he did not need the approval of anyone else to hire, a crew that has no one looking over their shoulders, that is answerable only to him, and take orders from no one else.

Who exactly did we elect as President?

Barack Obama?

Or Tony Saprano?

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Other Posts On This Topic

Comments

20 Responses to “Obama’s Gangster Government Has Taken Over America”

    Christopher Carpenter on July 20th, 2009 7:18 am

    I believe he has been trying to untie Americas bonnet of liberty and freedom since he was a junior senator from Illinois.

    Patty on July 20th, 2009 8:23 am

    Well I did not VOTE for Obama , people where shown who Obama was ! I would say to the people who voted for him , need to get busy getting him out of the White house NOW ! I do believe Obama will be his own undoing soon !

    carl on July 20th, 2009 8:25 am

    Christopher:
    His record would surely support your claim.

    Sandee on July 20th, 2009 8:35 am

    I can almost guarantee that Obama will go down in history as the absolute worst president America ever had. He was groomed for his office by Soros and others to send America into oblivion. Obama’s ego will keep him in the limelight destroying this country as fast as he possibly can. He has spent more money than the last 9 presidents put together. It has nothing to do with his skin color it is all his beliefs and his lies, he claims to be Christian but he is a Muslim through and through, he bows to other leaders and makes America look weak. Where is this mans birth certificate? Not a fake one the real one? He doesn’t have one!!! He needs to be voted out of office in 2012 and hopefully it won’t be too late.

    Michael De Nomie on July 20th, 2009 9:20 am

    In the Obama organized crime family,
    the Czars are akin to Capos.
    RICO?
    Nah, Holder is in the bag.

    carl on July 21st, 2009 3:23 am

    @Sandee
    Not only do we have to vote him out in 2012 but we need to turn control of Congress back to conservatives in 2010 so we can limit the amount of damage he does.

    @Michael
    You’re right, Holder won’t turn on the man who overlooked him being a tax cheat.

    carl on July 21st, 2009 3:28 am

    @Patty
    Trouble is, people were shown who Obama is and they voted for him anyway.

    The Other Lou on July 22nd, 2009 2:32 am

    I can’t believe all 100 Senators aren’t completely up in arms about the Czar thing.

    I still can’t believe Obama has killed capitalism in just f few months. 4 Million new jobs, what a joke, Obama’s firing people left and right. Congress killed the F22 Raptor program yesterday, how many good jobs did they have to end to get Obama to sign the military funding bill, so our troops would be properly supplied in a time of war.How many people a car dealerships have lost their job? How many insurance company employees are going to lose their job if Obamacare passes?

    Michele Bachmann is 100% right Gangster Government.

    It’s a little off track, but the #1 thing we need to do is push our Congressmen to fix the problem of members of the military getting their vote properly counted. In this age of technology there must be a solution, or else we’ll have another Minnesota every 2 year.

    carl on July 22nd, 2009 2:54 am

    Lou
    I agree with you 100% on the points in your first paragraph, with the exception of the F22.

    The Raptor was a boondoggle with a capital B, requiring something on the order of 20 hours of maintenance for each hour it was airborne.

    As to members of the military having their votes counted properly, again we are in agreement but i doubt if the Democrats will support any steps to correct the situation when having things the way they are suits their purposes just fine.

    Turfkiller on August 5th, 2009 10:01 am

    Senator Byrd was referring to President Bush and his gangsters. Not to worry though, not even the Republicans will stop this. They want to add more to power that the gangsters Bush and Chaney had and to which Senator Byrd was referring.

    no2whitey on August 9th, 2009 9:33 am

    why is it that white are ppl angry at the u.s. pres. all of a sudden
    i know alot of is subconcious racism

    Salvaterra AKA Publius on August 9th, 2009 9:39 am

    @no2whitey

    I define subconscious racism as someone who accuses anyone that disagrees with a president who happens to be black of being a racist.

    I define conscious racism as someone who would go by the name no2whitey on a blog.

    Christopher Carpenter on August 10th, 2009 10:33 pm

    I can see why someone would have a screen name like No 2 whitey and say something of the sort. Penciled in light color.. it has nothing to do with racism or the color of a man.. it has to do with the mans policy and character. Your president is more of an Arab than a black man. It’s true. Look it up. Research things and ask questions. Do your homework and workwork and be a fine upstanding citizen instead of blaming the disapproval of a president on unfounded ideas. Racism will always exist.. don’t get me wrong.. I truly believe it is a scab on our great country, the last bastion of freedom in this increasingly smaller world. But to blame disagreement on subconcious racism is not helping the situation.. in fact it is bringing the situation to an incendiary tone. America can do without that in this important discussion.

    Quote #1 for you.

    “The first principle of a free society is an untrammeled flow of words in an open forum.” Adlai E. Stevenson 1900-1965, American Lawyer, Politician

    Quote #2 for you

    ” Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about the things that matter. ” Martin Luther King .. if you know not of this man I feel bad for you.. you’re missing out.

    Werner Cech on September 28th, 2009 9:14 am

    Well Obama has definetly killed Capitalism. Here we are stuck with a terrible government for 4 more years. Why don’t people realize that government needs to step out of the way? The President should worry about the defense of this nation, rebuilding our infrastructure, and making sure competition is fair in this country. We don’t need national healthcare, we need to bring competition and a new set of rules to this industry. God Help us because we are in “deep sh__”

    Turfkiller on September 28th, 2009 10:08 am

    Dear Werner Cech, One reason our products and services are so expensive is due in part to the uncompetitive nature of the health care industry. It consumes too many resources with limited results.

    Also you need to get use to having a President that can do more than one thing at a time.

    Salvaterra AKA Publius on September 29th, 2009 8:35 am

    One reason our products and services are so expensive is due in part to the uncompetitive nature of the health care industry.

    I agree.

    Capitalism = competition for market share. Open the market and let companies compete nationwide and there is no need for the government to step in. A Government option is not competition, it is a power grab.

    Turfkiller on September 29th, 2009 9:20 am

    How they bypass capitalism.

    Health insurance is regulated at the state level, and under the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945, 15 U.S.C. section 1011, no federal antitrust law applies to the industry in any state in which such state-level regulation exists. This exemption is the major culprit in the creation and perpetuating of non-competitive health insurance.

    The McCarran-Ferguson exemption from the Sherman Antitrust Act for health insurers is the strangle-hold the insurance monopoly has on health care costs. This was recently reported by the American Medical Association and discussed by Ratigan on MSNBC.

    Only two industries are legally exempted from the Sherman Antitrust Act, Major League Baseball and Health Insurance companies.

    Salvaterra AKA Publius on September 30th, 2009 10:44 am

    @Turfkiller

    So it looks like we agree. The federal govt. should get rid of state mandates, and open the market nationally if they really want to lower the “skyrocketing” costs. They are very well capable of doing it. If they don’t move in this direction they are not serious about cutting costs.

    Turfkiller on September 30th, 2009 7:38 pm

    It has to be more than just federal regulation of insurance. That will still not level the playing field between large companies and individuals. This is why a public option is important.

    Salvaterra AKA Publius on September 30th, 2009 10:51 pm

    That is why Republicans have been pushing to allow small businesses to group together through small business associations so they can buy health insurance at the same rates large companies can.
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/10/republicans-obama-heres-health-plans/

    Seeing how most people in this country work for a small business, this would greatly help the individual. And there are other proposals to detach health insurance from employers altogether, allowing consumers and insurance companies to work directly with each other on a nationwide basis — again like the auto insurance industry. These options are far more attractive than a government option.