Birthers Versus Baby Killers
July 28, 2009 · carl · Print This Article
The folks who take offense against anyone who questions the legitimacy of the document Barack Obama claims is his birth certificate have hung the moniker “birthers” on people who raise such questions.
By and large, the people raising these question are conservatives, who are Pro-Life and anti-abortion.
We have written a few articles on this subject since World Net Daily broke the story of Major Stefan Cook, who had his orders to deploy to Afghanistan revoked when he questioned if Obama was eligible to be Commander-In-Chief caught our attention.
However, our interest in this topic is focused primarily on the possible constitutional crisis that may result is Obama is found to be ineligible to hold the office of the Presidency.
The folks suggesting the word “birthers” as an appropriate title are obvious Obama supporters, therefore it is only a logical conclusion that they follow a liberal political persuasion.
And the overwhelming majority of liberals consider themselves to be pro choice.
Consequently, in a spirit of fairness and bipartisanship, we propose that in the future, liberals, (who support abortion), henceforth be called baby killers.
After all, that’s what they are.
The title “pro choice” is an oxymoron.
What choice does the fetus have?
Can any of you liberal “pro choice” folks deny the fact that if a woman becomes pregnant, and if all other things are equal, the end result will be that a baby will be born?
Therefore, if that same woman has an abortion, she has in effect killed a baby.
So the baby killers title is appropriate.
Numerous web sites will continue to carry the argument regarding Obama’s birth certificate.
And the loudest voices will be heard from Obama supporters.
However, it’s ironic that these same people will also support a “health care reform bill” that would seek to withhold medical treatment from “those who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens.”
Many of these same people are demanding that abortion funding be included in the health care bill.
So they support what would , in effect, be state-sponsored euthansia, while at the same time demanding funding so that even more babies can be killed.
One of our subcribers summed it up best:
“That’s the difference between us and them.”
“Conservatives value all human life, from conception to death.”
I love it. I’ve long called them Pro-Death, baby killers is perfect as well. Did you see:
WND Exclusive
Tell Obama the meaning of the term ‘birth certificate’
FedEx personalized letter demanding he prove eligibility
right on Carl..as usual
I love it! Ann Coulter is an “obvious Obama supporter” and a liberal.
Birthers are wackos, equal to conspiracy theorists on all sides of the political landscape (”spectrum” is too limiting).
You’re displaying your black-and-white thinking.
I’m not a liberal, but I am “pro-choice”, and, yes, I can deny it, because it’s not true. Somewhere between 2/3 to 3/4 of all fertilized eggs self-abort. So the least likely result is that a baby will be born.
It’s really very simple. A fetus, while human, is not a legal person. The most correct terms are “pro-choice”, and, for those who want to enslave women, “anti-choice”.
beasty,
I wonder how much WND and Farah are going to profit from those “personalized letter”s.
Huh… never thought that Boortz was a liberal.
Glad to see you youngins catch up. I’ve been calling them baby killers for decades. Thanks for coming on board.