Congress Begins Intense Action To Repeal The Second Amendment
May 15, 2009 · carl · Print This Article
You gun owners better wake the hell up, the end is a lot closer than you think.
And I don’t want to hear any of this crap about another American revolution, or “they’ll take my gun when they pry it from my cold dead hands.”
Of the millions of gun owners in America, the ones who spout such drivel could hold a convention in an average-sized fast food restaurant.
Consider this a “call to arms” if you will for those of you who aren’t delusional enough to think that such idiocy is an effective plan for preserving our Second Amendment rights.
A treaty signed by former President Bill Clinton, but never ratifed by the Senate, is now under consideration by many members of the Senate, as well as having the enthusiastic support of President Barack Obama.
If this treaty is ratifed by the Senate, kiss the Second Amendment goodbye.
First, watch the video below as Lou Dobbs speaks of it.
Then click on the link below it to see for yourself the backdoor tactic the gun grabbers will use to invalidate your right to keep and bear arms.
Last of all click on the link below that for contact information for your member of Congress, pick up the damn phone and tell them in no uncertain terms that if they support this bill they are committing political suicide.
The way this administration rams through new legislation, the time to act is NOW!
Don’t wait for, or count on, the NRA to do it for you.
Click Here for the the phone numbers of your members of Congress and make your voice heard.
Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
Thanks for the info but this blogger is kinda dumb. He is ignorant of the Constitution and the USSC decisions that have ripped it apart. He is unaware of abuses that are worse than what caused the revolutionary war. I find it absolutely amazing that we are not up in arms against the border patrol, armed federal agents with police dogs, illegally stopping and detaining American citizens on highways that do not even cross the border. If they were to arrest this ignorant blogger for his hate speech and being a terrorist for his views, will he say thank you for arresting me under the laws of the US, and thank you for taking away my rights of habeus corpus under the Patriot Act. This ignorant blogger is not free and will not fight for freedom. Pathetic.
Alright Clay, I’ll type slowly so as not to confuse you.
I’m glad you thought enough of the information to thank me, now let’s examine why you think I’m “kinda dumb.”
I feel safe in saying that I am quite well versed in the provisions of the Constitution, and if you had the common sense of the average houseplant you would have noticed that the point of post had nothing to do with how Supreme Court decisions have affected our Constitutional rights, that is another subject altogether.
If you are so sure of my lack of knowledge about everything under the sun, perhaps we could put your psychic abilities to good use and you could send me some winning lottery numbers.
On second thought, never mind.
It’s obvious that you are so woefully ignorant that you would probably get the numbers mixed up.
Seeing as how I am “kinda dumb”, perchance you can explain to me what in the hell a posting about gun control has to do with the Supreme Court, the border patrol, federal agents, habeus corpus, the Patriot act, or any of the other delusional gibberish you are spouting.
Hate speech?
Where in the article did I make any statement that a rational human being would consider hate speech?
If you are refering to my insinuation that all of you armchair Rambo wanna-be’s are delusional thinking you will stage the next American Revolution with your semi-auto rifles, try pitting yor ArmaLites, Bushmasters, AR15’s, etc. against an Apache attack helicopter or a Bradley fighting vehicle.
I’d ask you to tell me how you made out, but you won’t be around to respond.
It’s idiotic pinheads like yourself that lead people to lump those of us who are law-abiding gun owners into the same category as gibberish spouting morons like yourself.
As for your final statement that I am not free and will not fight for freedom, simply is further proof that you have no idea what the hell you are talking about.
Whatever your twisted definitionof free is, I probaly don’t fit into it.
And as far as not fighting for freedom, allow me to ask you a few things.
Do those psychic powers of yours tell you every aspect of my life and background?
I love how you clowns who live in your mother’s basements playing video games all day think that being in combat is “really cool.”
Have you ever served in the military?
Have you ever been in a firefight, experienced being under an incoming mortar barrage?
Have you ever known what it feels like to watch men you have served with be killed in circumstances so horrible that most people can’t even begin to imagine what it is like?
Because unless you have, I’ll be damned if I will let some pinhead like you claim that I will not fight for freedom.
Clay
Better go easy on the Kool-Aid pal, I think it’s starting to rot your brain.
Someone expresses an opinion that trying to overthrow the government is a stupid idea and consider that as hate speech?
I think you better forget about fighting what you seem to consider the modern-day redcoats and keep an eye out for the guys with the sportcoats.
The kind that lace up in the back.
The right to bear arms has always been a constitutional right in this country all men have the right to have and bear arms , or not to bear arms.
by allowing any form of government to try and regulate you are committing treason against your fellow Americans.
its stated in the second amendment the right to bear arms for a reason .
our forefathers knew what they were doing , when they placed it in the constitution, they knew if we let the government do what they wanted and turning a blind eye the us would go from a republic to a oligarchy. the same way rome did in its day , from a democracy
to oligarchy.
massive unrest unemployment , etc etc .
what ever the reason we have a right to bear or not bear arms period. we have the right to free speech.
but one thing just because we don’t like smoking or guns or what ever the issue does not give us the right to take that away from another person plain and simple .
if you don’t like this move to another country because your a socialist . you obviously have a daddy complex.
the author of this blog is right , try to do things the legal way , if that fails we will either die fighting with a gun in our hand or we will over come an already increasingly oppressive power hungry government.
call your congressman, your state legislator, put the pressure mention the simple fact we will be sending them a pink slip if they support this . if that fails we can and will march on the capital ,
the tree of liberty from time to time is watered with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Ian
Although we will have to agree to disagree about dying with a gun in our hands, I appreciate your kind words and your support.
Come back and visit us again.
You are right of course. But the problem isn’t just gun laws. It is all laws. We know that certain things are just downright horrible and should be outlawed. One of you suggested that just because we don’t like something doesn’t give us the right to take it away from others. Does that apply to pedofilia as well? Do you see my point? The problem is also deciding who decides to make the laws and what laws are to be honored and there is debate about this among citizens, not just polititians. One could argue that if we are to abolish one law because it is inconsistent with freedom then we must abolish all laws because they are inconsistant with freedom. Do having our rights to do what we want also give us the right to take others rights away if they allow it? If that is the case then what the government is doing is legal and consistant with the natural laws of freedom, of course in this case it would also be our right to tell them to shove it and do what ever we wanted to anyway, right? What is right for one might not be right for all, and what is right for one may be frowned upon by many. And what is right for many may not be right for the one, unfortunately we live in a society whre people believe that the majority rules, absolutely. If we abolish one law we must abolish all laws to not tread on freedom. After all freedom is doing what you will, and free will is a given. So therefore freedom must also be. Now that is not to say that if you do something to piss off the majority they can’t cast you out, or excersize their freedoms and kill you or whatever. If you had the freedom to whatever you wanted to someone for whatever reason and they had the freedom to do whatever to you for any reason how likely are you to do something horrible to that person, knowing this freedom exists? You’re not. It is proven that the more readily available the means for destruction the less likely it is to be used. It isn’t taken for granted. OK, done rambling… for now….